[Users] OpenVZ vs. vserver

Tue Mar 27 14:08:27 EDT 2007

* Kir Kolyshkin <kir at openvz.org> wrote:

Hi,

> As per my experience porting to powerpc platform, OpenVZ is easily 
> portable, i.e. it is 95% platform-independent code (not counting the 
> checkpointing functionality, which IS very platform-specific).

we probably won't need checkpointing, so I hope it will run 
on mips ...

> So, if somebody needs OpenVZ for some currently unsupported platform 
> (say, ARM), they can either do a port themselves, or provide us with a 
> couple of boxes and we will do the port.

maybe I'll have a look at it in a few weeks.

cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 	http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
	http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------