[Devel] [PATCH VZ10 2/5] drivers/vhost/blk: report correct used-ring lengths
Andrey Zhadchenko
andrey.zhadchenko at virtuozzo.com
Mon Aug 24 18:04:42 MSK 2026
On 8/20/26 16:11, Vasileios Almpanis wrote:
>> We are expected to return amount of bytes written to the guest,
>> which also includes status.
>>
>> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-138640
>> Fixes: 40a5928ec730 ("drivers/vhost: vhost-blk accelerator for virtio-blk guests")
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko at virtuozzo.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
>> index 3def988cdf18..ae6b916f96e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/blk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
>> @@ -439,12 +439,14 @@ static int vhost_blk_req_submit(struct vhost_blk_req *req)
>>
>> static int vhost_blk_req_handle(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> struct virtio_blk_outhdr *hdr,
>> - u16 head, u16 total_iov_nr)
>> + u16 head, u16 out, u16 in)
>> {
>> struct vhost_blk *blk = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_blk, dev);
>> struct vhost_blk_vq *blk_vq = container_of(vq, struct vhost_blk_vq, vq);
>> struct vhost_blk_req *req;
>> + u16 total_iov_nr = out + in;
>> struct iov_iter iter;
>> + size_t in_len;
>> int ret, len;
>> u8 status;
>>
>> @@ -455,8 +457,9 @@ static int vhost_blk_req_handle(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> req->sector = hdr->sector;
>> req->iov = blk_vq->iov;
>> req->bio_err = 0;
>> + in_len = iov_length(vq->iov + out, in);
>>
>> - if (iov_length(vq->iov, total_iov_nr) < sizeof(status))
>> + if (in_len < sizeof(status) || in_len > INT_MAX)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> req->len = iov_length(vq->iov, total_iov_nr) - sizeof(status);
>> @@ -492,14 +495,14 @@ static int vhost_blk_req_handle(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
>> if (ret)
>> break;
>> - vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, len);
>> + vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, in_len);
>> break;
>> default:
>> status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP;
>> ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
>> if (ret)
>> break;
>> - vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, 0);
>> + vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, sizeof(status));
>> }
>>
>> return ret;
>> @@ -555,7 +558,7 @@ static void vhost_blk_handle_guest_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = vhost_blk_req_handle(vq, &hdr, head, out + in);
>> + ret = vhost_blk_req_handle(vq, &hdr, head, out, in);
>> if (ret == -EAGAIN || ret == -ENOMEM) {
>> vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
>> vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
>> @@ -604,7 +607,7 @@ static void vhost_blk_handle_host_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
>> if (vhost_blk_set_status(req, status)) {
>> vhostblk_vq_err(blk, vq, "Failed to write status");
>> } else {
>> - vhost_add_used(vq, req->head, req->len);
>> + vhost_add_used(vq, req->head, req->len + sizeof(status));
> Is req->len + sizeof(status) the right thing to use for write requests?
> We should only write the status byte not status + payload length
>
Oh yes. I fixed the missing status but not this bug. Thanks!
More information about the Devel
mailing list