[Devel] [PATCH VZ10 2/5] drivers/vhost/blk: report correct used-ring lengths
Vasileios Almpanis
vasileios.almpanis at virtuozzo.com
Thu Aug 20 17:11:04 MSK 2026
> We are expected to return amount of bytes written to the guest,
> which also includes status.
>
> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-138640
> Fixes: 40a5928ec730 ("drivers/vhost: vhost-blk accelerator for virtio-blk guests")
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko at virtuozzo.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
> index 3def988cdf18..ae6b916f96e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
> @@ -439,12 +439,14 @@ static int vhost_blk_req_submit(struct vhost_blk_req *req)
>
> static int vhost_blk_req_handle(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> struct virtio_blk_outhdr *hdr,
> - u16 head, u16 total_iov_nr)
> + u16 head, u16 out, u16 in)
> {
> struct vhost_blk *blk = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_blk, dev);
> struct vhost_blk_vq *blk_vq = container_of(vq, struct vhost_blk_vq, vq);
> struct vhost_blk_req *req;
> + u16 total_iov_nr = out + in;
> struct iov_iter iter;
> + size_t in_len;
> int ret, len;
> u8 status;
>
> @@ -455,8 +457,9 @@ static int vhost_blk_req_handle(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> req->sector = hdr->sector;
> req->iov = blk_vq->iov;
> req->bio_err = 0;
> + in_len = iov_length(vq->iov + out, in);
>
> - if (iov_length(vq->iov, total_iov_nr) < sizeof(status))
> + if (in_len < sizeof(status) || in_len > INT_MAX)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> req->len = iov_length(vq->iov, total_iov_nr) - sizeof(status);
> @@ -492,14 +495,14 @@ static int vhost_blk_req_handle(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
> if (ret)
> break;
> - vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, len);
> + vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, in_len);
> break;
> default:
> status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP;
> ret = vhost_blk_set_status(req, status);
> if (ret)
> break;
> - vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, 0);
> + vhost_add_used_and_signal(&blk->dev, vq, head, sizeof(status));
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -555,7 +558,7 @@ static void vhost_blk_handle_guest_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> break;
> }
>
> - ret = vhost_blk_req_handle(vq, &hdr, head, out + in);
> + ret = vhost_blk_req_handle(vq, &hdr, head, out, in);
> if (ret == -EAGAIN || ret == -ENOMEM) {
> vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
> vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> @@ -604,7 +607,7 @@ static void vhost_blk_handle_host_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> if (vhost_blk_set_status(req, status)) {
> vhostblk_vq_err(blk, vq, "Failed to write status");
> } else {
> - vhost_add_used(vq, req->head, req->len);
> + vhost_add_used(vq, req->head, req->len + sizeof(status));
Is req->len + sizeof(status) the right thing to use for write requests?
We should only write the status byte not status + payload length
--
Vasileios Almpanis <vasileios.almpanis at virtuozzo.com>
More information about the Devel
mailing list