[Devel] Re: Fwd: Re: lxc-performance?
Balbir Singh
balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Oct 14 06:54:18 PDT 2010
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:11 PM, MALATTAR
<mouhannad.alattar at univ-fcomte.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 12/10/2010 07:05, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki a écrit :
> > On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:09:51 +0200
> > MALATTAR<mouhannad.alattar at univ-fcomte.fr> wrote:
> >
> >> Le 07/10/2010 16:43, MALATTAR a écrit :
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> 06.10.2010 23:41, MALATTAR ?????:
> >>>
> >>>> / the container dora1, where i launch an instance of my IDS, does not take
> >>> />/ more than 70 MB as memory even though the memory limit for it is much
> >>> />/ bigger than this value,
> >>> /
> >>> How do you measure memory usage?
> >> by using the command:
> >> lxc-cgroup -n dora1 memory.usage_in_bytes
> >>> What's in memory.max_usage_in_bytes of
> >>> the container's cgroup?
> >> executing the next command lxc-cgroup -n dora1 memory.max_usage_in_bytes
> >> gave me 70193152 bytes
> >>
> > Hmm. what latencytop shows ?
> >
> > You can see this kind of output.
> > ==
> > Cause Maximum Percentage
> > Writing a page to disk 551.6 msec 36.8 %
> > Fork() system call 273.7 msec 1.1 %
> > Page fault 253.9 msec 29.5 %
> > Writing buffer to disk (synchronous) 225.9 msec 2.9 %
> > Creating block layer request 202.7 msec 17.1 %
> > Walking directory tree 161.5 msec 1.4 %
> > [congestion_wait] 97.6 msec 4.4 %
> > Executing a program 97.1 msec 0.3 %
> > synchronous write 73.9 msec 0.1 %
> > ==
> >
> > IMHO, if memory limit is the problem, "Page Fault" tend to be big.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Kame
> >
> >
> executing latencytop during the execution of my program gave me:
> Cause
> Maximum Percentage
> fsync() on a file (type 'F' for details) 45.1
> msec 2.2 %
> Waiting for event (poll) 5.0
> msec 47.9 %
> Userspace lock contention 5.0
> msec 43.1 %
> Waiting for event (select) 4.8
> msec 5.7 %
> Throttling GPU while waiting for commands 3.4 msec 0.4 %
> [i915_do_wait_request] 3.3
> msec 0.5 %
> Waiting for data on unix socket 0.3
> msec 0.1 %
> Waiting for TTY data 0.2
> msec 0.1 %
>
> Process mysqld (291) Total: 2.3 msec
> Waiting for data on unix socket 0.3 msec 100.0 %
>
> It seems that there is no problem...
>
> also memtest command was able to allocate up to 1024MB but it takes a
> long time
> for one loop only ...
> So, i think the problem is in my program not in the container, is not it?
Could you please dump your cgroup filesystem? What is
memory.limit_in_bytes, memory.stat? fysnc() can clearly hold up things
across the filesystem with ext3 and other FS. The source does sound
like mysql database for the frequent fsync's - is that correct? What
does the iotop output look like?
Balbir
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list