[Devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] c/r: Add AF_UNIX support (v6)
Dan Smith
danms at us.ibm.com
Wed Jul 29 07:49:15 PDT 2009
SH> At the moment you miss out on the security_socket_connect() call.
Is that any different than the path involved when a process does a
socketpair() call?
SH> Still your code is so customized that perhaps an explicit
SH> security_socket_connect() call in your sock_unix_join() may be the
SH> way to go...
So, when I do the join, I really should run the check on both the
remote and local addresses, right? The join operation is not really a
connect in the sense of being one-sided...
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms at us.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list