[Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ppc vdso: make sure rc is defined
Nathan Lynch
ntl at pobox.com
Tue Jul 7 13:47:39 PDT 2009
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue at us.ibm.com> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serue at us.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso.c
> index 48beff6..679b394 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso.c
> @@ -240,8 +240,10 @@ int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
> }
>
> /* for restart(2), double check that we got we asked for */
> - if (start && vdso_base != start)
> + if (start && vdso_base != start) {
> + rc = -EBUSY;
> goto fail_mmapsem;
> + }
>
> /*
> * our vma flags don't have VM_WRITE so by default, the process isn't
Is this why you sent this patch?
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso.c: In function arch_setup_additional_pages:
arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso.c:194: error: rc may be used uninitialized in this function
If so, looks fine to me.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list