[Devel] Questions about development kernels.
Pavel Emelyanov
xemul at openvz.org
Mon Sep 22 07:45:10 PDT 2008
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Hey all!
>
> A few questions about the development kernel branches. My Fedora 8 and
> Fedora 9 systems are all now at 2.6.26 kernels but the OpenVZ stuff is
> stuck on 2.6.24-ovz005.1.
>
> * Is there any expectation of a release from the 2.6.26 branch any time
> soon?
Yes. I hope next week we'll have 2.6.26-ovz001 and 2.6.24-ovz006 (after this
2.6.24 will be frozen)
> * I see in the 2.6.26 git repository a tag for 2.6.27-ovz-fork. Does
> that mean that the 2.6.26 repository is actually 2.6.27 now or what?
This just mean, that we have a 2.6.27 kernel with our patches for our
purposes (there's no 2.6.27 repo, isn't it?)
> * How stable is the 2.6.26 branch? Can a kernel be build with a
> reasonable expectation to function (relative to the 2.6.24-ovz005.1
> build which has been reasonable stable for me)?
None of development branches were ever considered to be stable. The 2.6.26
is not an exclusion from this rule.
> * My Fedora systems running 2.6.24-ovz005.1 kernels are complaining
> about auditd. I see these errors from sudo:
>
> audit_log_user_command(): Connection refused
>
> That's because auditd is not running and will not start. That's not
> starting, I believe, because CONFIG_AUDIT is not enabled in the kernel
> build. Anyone know of any reason why this could not / should not be
> enabled? I'll file a bugzilla on it later but was wondering if this was
> one of the things that hadn't been gotten around to yet.
Please, fill a bug with it.
> Mike
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at openvz.org
> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
More information about the Devel
mailing list