[Devel] Re: [RFC 1/2] memcg: hierarchy support core (yet another one)
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com
Wed May 28 22:23:37 PDT 2008
On Thu, 29 May 2008 14:11:04 +0900 (JST)
yamamoto at valinux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > @@ -39,6 +39,18 @@ struct res_counter {
> > */
> > unsigned long long failcnt;
> > /*
> > + * the amount of resource comes from parenet cgroup. Should be
> > + * returned to the parent at destroying/resizing this res_counter.
> > + */
> > + unsigned long long borrow;
>
> why do you need this in addition to the limit?
> ie. aren't their values always equal except the root cgroup?
>
yes, except the root group. that's a reason....no,no
To be honest, I thought of different concept of hierarchy when I started this
and borrow != limit in first version. But it was complicated and big..
Finally, I set borrow=limit but I didn't remove "borrrow" because it seems
to help a man to undetstand the whole logic.
I'm now retrying borrow != limit version, again. (but no good progress ;)
Thanks,
-Kame
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list