[Devel] Re: Pid namespaces problems

[Daniel Lezcano]

Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>>> - There are several architectures with their own signal functions for
>>>   other OS compatibility that have are using _pid and not _vpid
>>>   variants of functions. (irix and solaris)
>>>   arch/mips/kernel/irixsig.c:irix_waitsys
>>>   arch/mips/kernel/sysirix.c:irix_setpgrp
>>>   arch/sparc64/solaris/misc.c:solaris_procids
>> Ok. Looks like your list is the same as mine. That's good to hear
>> that I haven't missed anything important.
> 
> We've also talked about af_unix credentials.
> 
>> So, I see that you're about to take a closer look at the pid
>> namespaces. If so, then what time can we expect the net namespace
>> activity to go on? Or (if you don't mind) can we start merging
>> the patches to David as soon as he opens his 2.6.25 merge window?
> 
> I think daniel and benjamin are also getting ready for the 2.6.25 
> merge window.

Yes, right.
We are identifying the ipv4 subset patches to send to David.



_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers