[CRIU] Project for GSoC 2019: Optimize logging engine

[Vaibhav Gupta]

You are definitely right Sir,
And I assure you from my side regarding SoC rules.
.
I was just going through GSoC Students Reccomendations Page:
https://criu.org/GSoC_Students_Recommendations
.
and as mentioned in point 3:

*Starting playing with CRIU is as simple as one, two, three: *

   1. *Get the sources from [1]
   <https://github.com/checkpoint-restore/criu>*
   2. *Build them with make*
   3. *Do your first C/R by running a simple test with zdtm.py run -t
   static/env00*

I was trying to run the test when i faced tainting problem and asked the
query on mailing list.

Thank you
Vaibhav Gupta

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:20 PM Radostin Stoyanov <rstoyanov1 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 14/03/2019 11:15, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> > On 3/14/19 1:49 PM, Radostin Stoyanov wrote:
> >> On 14/03/2019 10:33, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> >>> On 3/14/19 10:27 AM, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> >>>> Yah, I found it and already implemented it in the command. Tests
> passed successfully after that.
> >>>> .
> >>>> I even mailed it.
> >>>> .
> >>>> But thanks for attending the query.
> >>> Gents, please, note, that according to the gsoc rules any dev activity
> that starts
> >>> before official gsoc coding dates cannot be submitted to google for
> evaluation.
> >> To be more specific [1]:
> >>
> >> 1.4 "Evaluation" means an evaluation by the Mentor of his or her
> >> Student’s work or an evaluation by the Student of his or her Mentor, as
> >> applicable.
> >>
> >> (8.1) (a) (i) the Student is only required to submit an overall
> >> Evaluation of the Mentors; and
> >>
> >> (ii) only one (1) Mentor is required to submit an Evaluation of the
> >> Student. If more than one (1) Mentor submits an Evaluation, only the
> >> final Evaluation submitted before the deadline will be accepted.
> >>
> >> (e) (i) The Mentor will evaluate the Student’s Project Submissions based
> >> on the work from the beginning of the work period until the start of the
> >> evaluation period. Any work done during the evaluation period itself
> >> will be considered for the next evaluation period.
> >>
> >> (ii) The Mentor will evaluate the Student’s Project Submissions against
> >> the Organization Project Criteria.
> >>
> >> [1] https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/rules/
> > Yes, I meant the 7.4.d item from this doc:
> >
> >    If a Project Proposal is for a Project that the Student is already
> working
> >    on, the Student must note this in the Project Proposal. Any work done
> on the
> >    Project prior to acceptance of the Project Proposal will not be
> considered
> >    for Evaluations.
> >
> > How should we read this? Is it purely up to the mentors which work to
> consider
> > for evaluation, or will google consider any ... "patches sent" (?)
> before May 27
> > to be not-applicable for evaluation?
> To best of my knowledge, it is a responsibility of the mentor to
> evaluate the student's work (with "pass" or "fail" grade) at the Phase 1
> deadline, the Phase 2 deadline, and the Final deadline.
>
> And:
> - Evaluations must be in the form of responses to questions provided by
> Google.
> - Google may make Evaluations available to other Google employees, third
> parties, or the Organization or Student, as applicable.
> - Google may use Evaluations internally to improve Google Summer of Code
> and for recruiting purposes.
> - Google will announce the Final Results.
>
> Radostin
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/criu/attachments/20190315/fd70255d/attachment.html>