[CRIU] [PATCH] criu: add a shell wrapper

Adrian Reber adrian at lisas.de
Thu Apr 21 23:31:08 PDT 2016


On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:29:11PM +0300, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 10:13 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 05:49:02PM +0300, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> >>I may suggest - can we use ld's -rpath option?
> >>That will add directory to runtime library search path.
> >>I mean, something like that (completely untested):
> >>
> >>--->8---
> >>diff --git a/criu/Makefile b/criu/Makefile
> >>index 1836bde5e1d3..14bf6d3c08f6 100644
> >>--- a/criu/Makefile
> >>+++ b/criu/Makefile
> >>@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> >>  # here is a workaround for a bug in libnl-3:
> >>  # 6a8d90f5fec4 "attr: Allow attribute type 0"
> >>  LDFLAGS                        += -Wl,--wrap=nla_parse,--wrap=nlmsg_parse
> >>+LDFLAGS                        += -Wl,-rpath,'$$ORIGIN/../soccr'
> >This sounds like a bad idea from the packaging stand point of view.
> >For the criu binary installed under /usr this will be the wrong path.
> 
> Hmm, so what's the point?
> It can contain multiple paths:
> LDFLAGS                        +=
> -Wl,-rpath,'/lib:/usr/lib:$$ORIGIN/../soccr'
> 
> Or anything else.
> Or I didn't get your message right.

This adds some random path to the resulting binary which is only valid
during build-time and has no value on the system running the binary.

Various distributions have rules to not use RPATH at all in their
packages:

https://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath

So RPATH might be useful during testing but not for the released binary.
There are tools to remove it after the build, but that would add an
additional step in the package building process.

		Adrian


More information about the CRIU mailing list