[Devel] [PATCH vz10] fs/fuse kio: unlink the tx before completing its msg on RDMA_READ_ACK

[Konstantin Khorenko]

Kui Liu
I prefer to drop this one, it doesn't make anything better though.

On 9/28/26 17:03, Konstantin Khorenko wrote:
> Use safe style: remove the tx from the list and clear tx->msg
> before completing the message, so the list never exposes a dead
> pointer.
> 
> Right now it's not a problem: currently nobody reads ex->msg without
> ep->mutex, so it's a precausion.
> 
> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-141673
> 
> Feature: vStorage
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko at virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rdma_io.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rdma_io.c b/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rdma_io.c
> index 2001297010a64..c582b583cf797 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rdma_io.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rdma_io.c
> @@ -928,9 +928,11 @@ static int rio_handle_rx_read_ack(struct pcs_rdmaio *rio,
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(tx, &rio->active_txs, list)
>  		if (tx->xid == rack->xid) {
> -			rio_msg_sent(rio, NULL, tx->msg, 1);
> -			tx->msg = NULL;
> +			struct pcs_msg *msg = tx->msg;
> +
>  			list_del(&tx->list);
> +			tx->msg = NULL;
> +			rio_msg_sent(rio, NULL, msg, 1);
>  			rio_handle_tx(rio, tx, !rack->status);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 0679f0d70523972eec3a0643565521d93e26eb9c
> change-id: 20260928-prep-kh-vstor-141673-kio-read-ack-order-9fc2b40d4077
> 
> Best regards,
> --  
> Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko at virtuozzo.com>
>