[Devel] [PATCH vz10] drivers/vhost/blk: take vq->mutex in the kick handlers
Konstantin Khorenko
khorenko at virtuozzo.com
Mon Sep 28 18:25:08 MSK 2026
vhost.h documents vhost_vq_set_backend()/vhost_vq_get_backend() as
"need to call with vq->mutex acquired": vq->private_data is a plain
field with no barriers.
* vhost-net, vsock and scsi all take vq->mutex in their kick handlers
* vhost-blk reads the backend and works with the ring without it
On a weakly ordered CPU (arm64) the two stores can become visible in the
opposite order:
CPU0: VHOST_BLK_SET_BACKEND CPU1: vhost worker
----------------------------------- -------------------------------
blk_vq->req = kvmalloc_array(...);
mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
vhost_vq_set_backend(vq, backend);
mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
backend store becomes visible
f = vhost_vq_get_backend(vq);
/* sees the new backend */
head = vhost_get_vq_desc(...);
req = &blk_vq->req[head];
/* sees the old req: NULL on
the first SET_BACKEND, a
freed pointer after a -1/fd
cycle - a NULL-offset oops
or a use-after-free */
req store becomes visible - too late
x86-64 TSO forbids both the store-store reordering on CPU0 and the
load-load reordering on CPU1, which is the only reason the current code
works there.
Fixes: d8722ff88c5d ("drivers/vhost: vhost-blk accelerator for virtio-blk guests")
https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-138640
Feature: vhost-blk: in-kernel accelerator for virtio-blk guests
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko at virtuozzo.com>
---
drivers/vhost/blk.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/blk.c b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
index fbdd04f5a7e28..b170439a1806d 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/blk.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/blk.c
@@ -530,9 +530,11 @@ static void vhost_blk_handle_guest_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
blk = container_of(vq->dev, struct vhost_blk, dev);
blk_vq = container_of(vq, struct vhost_blk_vq, vq);
+ mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
+
f = vhost_vq_get_backend(vq);
if (!f)
- return;
+ goto out;
vhost_disable_notify(&blk->dev, vq);
for (;;) {
@@ -580,6 +582,8 @@ static void vhost_blk_handle_guest_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
break;
}
}
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
}
static void vhost_blk_handle_host_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
@@ -594,6 +598,8 @@ static void vhost_blk_handle_host_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
blk_vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_blk_vq, work);
vq = &blk_vq->vq;
+
+ mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
llnode = llist_del_all(&blk_vq->llhead);
added = false;
while (llnode) {
@@ -627,6 +633,7 @@ static void vhost_blk_handle_host_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
if (likely(added))
vhost_signal(&blk->dev, vq);
+ mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
}
/* It is forbidden to call more than one vhost_blk_flush() simultaneously */
---
base-commit: 0679f0d70523972eec3a0643565521d93e26eb9c
change-id: 20260928-prep-kh-vstor-138640-vhost-blk-vq-mutex-84a1a46032ae
Best regards,
--
Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko at virtuozzo.com>
More information about the Devel
mailing list