[Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 0/4] configs: a User Mode Linux kernel for the KUnit tests

[Konstantin Khorenko]

On 10/26/26 22:16, Eva Kurchatova (Virtuozzo) wrote:
> 
> On 10/26/26 20:05, Konstantin Khorenko wrote:
>> Several KUnit tests can only be built into the kernel image, and the
>> shipped kernel builds its tests as modules, so nothing runs them. The
>> series adds a "um" config variant: a User Mode Linux kernel with every
>> KUnit test built in, under KASAN and UBSAN. kernel.spec builds it with
>> ARCH=um, kernel-selftests-internal ships it, and the hci-kunit test runs
>> it.
>>
>> The variant inherits the generic and generic-x86 layers, so the tests
>> meet the options of the shipped x86_64 kernel, vz ones included. What
>> differs lives in custom-overrides/generic/um, one file per option as
>> for the other variants, and passes process_configs.sh -n -w -c.
>>
>> - 1/4: the um variant, with the reason for each option turned off
>> - 2/4: KASAN_KUNIT_TEST keeps its prompt under KUNIT_ALL_TESTS, so
>>    that the um config can leave it out
>> - 3/4: KASAN, without its self-test
>> - 4/4: no debug info, which kernel.spec would throw away anyway
>>
>> Outside this series:
>>
>> - vzkernel.vzspecs: "kernel.spec: build the User Mode Linux KUnit
>>    kernel" builds and packages it from kernel-um-rhel.config
>> - git-publish.sh brings kernel-um-rhel.config to vzkernel.vzspecs
>>    along with the x86_64 configs
>> - hci-tests PR #9241 (hci-kunit) runs it; a follow-up boots it with
>>    kasan_multi_shot
>>
>> The overrides and their reasons come from Eva Kurchatova's
>> kunit-uml-config.sh approach in vzkernel.vzspecs, which derived the
>> config at build time. This series moves the config into the kernel
>> tree.
>>
>> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-143636
>> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-148112
>>
>> Assisted-by: LLM
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko at virtuozzo.com>
> 
> 
> May I proceed with the v2 of this patchset of yours with all of the 
> points stated in the previous message?

Nope, please wait a bit, i have another suggestion.