[Devel] [PATCH vz9 3/3] eventpoll: fix ep_remove struct eventpoll / struct file UAF
Vladimir Riabchun
vladimir.riabchun at virtuozzo.com
Wed Jul 8 13:12:53 MSK 2026
On 7/7/26 16:06, Eva Kurchatova wrote:
> [ Upstream commit a6dc643c69311677c574a0f17a3f4d66a5f3744b ]
>
> ep_remove() (via ep_remove_file()) cleared file->f_ep under
> file->f_lock but then kept using @file inside the critical section
> (is_file_epoll(), hlist_del_rcu() through the head, spin_unlock).
> A concurrent __fput() taking the eventpoll_release() fastpath in
> that window observed the transient NULL, skipped
> eventpoll_release_file() and ran to f_op->release / file_free().
>
> For the epoll-watches-epoll case, f_op->release is
> ep_eventpoll_release() -> ep_clear_and_put() -> ep_free(), which
> kfree()s the watched struct eventpoll. Its embedded ->refs
> hlist_head is exactly where epi->fllink.pprev points, so the
> subsequent hlist_del_rcu()'s "*pprev = next" scribbles into freed
> kmalloc-192 memory.
>
> In addition, struct file is SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so the slot
> backing @file could be recycled by alloc_empty_file() --
> reinitializing f_lock and f_ep -- while ep_remove() is still
> nominally inside that lock. The upshot is an attacker-controllable
> kmem_cache_free() against the wrong slab cache.
>
> Pin @file via epi_fget() at the top of ep_remove() and gate the
> critical section on the pin succeeding. With the pin held @file
> cannot reach refcount zero, which holds __fput() off and
> transitively keeps the watched struct eventpoll alive across the
> hlist_del_rcu() and the f_lock use, closing both UAFs.
>
> If the pin fails @file has already reached refcount zero and its
> __fput() is in flight. Because we bailed before clearing f_ep,
> that path takes the eventpoll_release() slow path into
> eventpoll_release_file() and blocks on ep->mtx until the waiter
> side's ep_clear_and_put() drops it. The bailed epi's share of
> ep->refcount stays intact, so the trailing ep_refcount_dec_and_test()
> in ep_clear_and_put() cannot free the eventpoll out from under
> eventpoll_release_file(); the orphaned epi is then cleaned up
> there.
>
> A successful pin also proves we are not racing
> eventpoll_release_file() on this epi, so drop the now-redundant
> re-check of epi->dying under f_lock. The cheap lockless
> READ_ONCE(epi->dying) fast-path bailout stays.
>
> Fixes: 58c9b016e128 ("epoll: use refcount to reduce ep_mutex contention")
> Reported-by: Jaeyoung Chung <jjy600901 at snu.ac.kr>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260423-work-epoll-uaf-v1-6-2470f9eec0f5@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal at kernel.org>
> (cherry picked from commit 9324de74a3a59b9fde9b62ee45ebaa71458ba2e5)
>
> Signed-off-by: Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova at virtuozzo.com>
>
> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-137490
> Feature: fix epoll cve
> ---
> fs/eventpoll.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> index 7ac22aadaf8b..c937325c614b 100644
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
> kfree_rcu(ep, rcu);
> }
>
> +static struct file *epi_fget(const struct epitem *epi);
> +
> /*
> * Removes a "struct epitem" from the eventpoll RB tree and deallocates
> * all the associated resources. Must be called with "mtx" held.
> @@ -725,7 +727,7 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
> */
> static bool __ep_remove(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi, bool force)
> {
> - struct file *file = epi->ffd.file;
> + struct file *file = NULL;
> struct epitems_head *to_free;
> struct hlist_head *head;
>
> @@ -736,13 +738,29 @@ static bool __ep_remove(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi, bool force)
> */
> ep_unregister_pollwait(ep, epi);
>
> - /* Remove the current item from the list of epoll hooks */
> - spin_lock(&file->f_lock);
> - if (epi->dying && !force) {
> - spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
> - return false;
> + if (!force) {
> + /* cheap sync with eventpoll_release_file() */
> + if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(epi->dying)))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we manage to grab a reference it means we're not in
> + * eventpoll_release_file() and aren't going to be.
> + */
> + file = epi_fget(epi);
> + if (!file)
> + return false;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * For force (eventpoll_release_file()), the caller already owns
> + * the file and set epi->dying; the file is safe to access
> + * directly but its refcount is zero so epi_fget() would fail.
> + */
> + file = epi->ffd.file;
> }
I don't like this. It seems to be a correct backport of original patch,
but it is very hard to verify it.
I'd prefer taking stable backport patchsets, check this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260628161933.532572-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com/
This will make the review and following fixes of the code much easier.
Two other patches are fine.
>
> + /* Remove the current item from the list of epoll hooks */
> + spin_lock(&file->f_lock);
> to_free = NULL;
> head = file->f_ep;
> if (head->first == &epi->fllink && !epi->fllink.next) {
> @@ -776,6 +794,10 @@ static bool __ep_remove(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi, bool force)
> call_rcu(&epi->rcu, epi_rcu_free);
>
> percpu_counter_dec(&ep->user->epoll_watches);
> + if (!force) {
> + /* Put down the pinned file reference */
> + fput(file);
> + }
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -993,7 +1015,7 @@ void eventpoll_release_file(struct file *file)
> spin_lock(&file->f_lock);
> if (file->f_ep && file->f_ep->first) {
> epi = hlist_entry(file->f_ep->first, struct epitem, fllink);
> - epi->dying = true;
> + WRITE_ONCE(epi->dying, true);
> spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
>
> /*
--
Best regards, Riabchun Vladimir
Linux Kernel Developer, Virtuozzo
More information about the Devel
mailing list