<div dir="ltr">It's ironic to see the claim of a free open source virtualization platform. <br><br>I was doing a quick latency comparison using a command like: time ssh $user@$host w (with ssh key login)<div><br></div><div>In my experience that typically takes 125-150 ms for OVZ, 250-300 ms for LXC, and 300-500 ms for QEMU/KVM.<br><br>Joe<br><br><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 4:07 AM jehan Procaccia <<a href="mailto:jehan.procaccia@imtbs-tsp.eu">jehan.procaccia@imtbs-tsp.eu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<p>Hi, exactly same story here, long time user of openVZ , even
subscribe to few Virtuozzo licences (VHS) to support the project</p>
<p>we've been waiting for ovz9 to no avail, nowdays that there's a
RHEL 10, there might be an interest for ovz 10 ! <br>
</p>
<p>anyway, we've moved to Proxmox, using LXC container when
possible, that works quite fine, I didn't notice yet a 2 times
faster result from PMX/LCX in regards to openVZ CT, but didn't
took the time to bench .</p>
<p>it's indeed a shame, while Virtuozzo still claim :</p>
<p><font size="2"><i><a href="https://openvz.org/" target="_blank">OpenVZ</a> is a free, open-source
virtualization solution available under GNU GPL. <b>OpenVZ is
the base for Virtuozzo Hybrid Server</b>, the commercial
solution that builds on OpenVZ and offers additional benefits
to customers.</i></font></p>
<p>cf :
<a href="https://docs.virtuozzo.com/virtuozzo_hybrid_server_7_users_guide/learning-basics/vhs-vs-openvz.html" target="_blank">https://docs.virtuozzo.com/virtuozzo_hybrid_server_7_users_guide/learning-basics/vhs-vs-openvz.html</a></p>
<p>jehan.<br>
</p>
<div>On 07/10/2025 18:01, jjs - mainphrame
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi all, <br>
<br>
I was an openvz and virtuozzo user and admin since around 2011
or so. Since the company ended their support for OVZ, I've
reluctantly migrated almost everything to proxmox.<br>
<br>
I still have containers on two OVZ VMs on Proxmox, but I'm about
to migrate their functionality away and shut down the OVZ VMs
for good.<br>
<br>
I did some preparatory testing and couldn't help but notice that
the OVZ CTs are still much snappier than KVM VMs or LXC
containers. Even with OVZ running in a VM, the network response
time on the OVZ container s is about 3 times faster than that of
a KVM VM, and over twice as fast as an LXC container.<br>
<br>
A shame, really. This was the best virtualization platform. But
life goes on.<br>
<br>
I'd be curious if there was any hope for OpenVZ down the road,
or what alternatives have been chosen in its place.<br>
<br>
Joe<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Users@openvz.org" target="_blank">Users@openvz.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote></div>