<div dir="ltr">Actually, I did an update, which downloaded 344 packages, but would not install any of them, complaining about a missing public key:<br><br><br>Last few lines of yum upgrade output:<br><br>Public key for yum-utils-4.0.24-4.vl9.noarch.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: yum-utils-4.0.24-4.vl9.noarch<br> GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/VZLINUX_GPG_KEY, file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Virtuozzo-9<br>Public key for zip-3.0-33.vl9.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: zip-3.0-33.vl9.x86_64<br> GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/VZLINUX_GPG_KEY, file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Virtuozzo-9<br>Public key for zlib-1.2.11-31.vl9.1.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: zlib-1.2.11-31.vl9.1.x86_64<br> GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/VZLINUX_GPG_KEY, file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Virtuozzo-9<br>The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction.<br>You can remove cached packages by executing 'yum clean packages'.<br>Error: GPG check FAILED<br>[root@ovz9 ~]# <br><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 3:38 PM jjs - mainphrame <<a href="mailto:jjs@mainphrame.com">jjs@mainphrame.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I'm curious as well.<br><br>I've downloaded an openvz9 image and have been testing with it, but the kernel is still the one from February. <br><br>Hope to see some updates soon.<br><br>Jake<br><br><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 3:04 PM Jonathan Wright <<a href="mailto:jonathan@knownhost.com" target="_blank">jonathan@knownhost.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
As a followup to Maik's announcement here back in February <br>
(<a href="https://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/users/2022-February/008175.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/users/2022-February/008175.html</a>) I'm <br>
wondering about the status of OpenVZ 9. There appear to have been no <br>
new builds or packages published to the repositories since those initial <br>
uploads. I would've at least expected a rebuild against RHEL's new <br>
sources after the 9.0 GA.<br>
<br>
I'm hoping that OpenVZ 9 doesn't have the same fate as 8 - getting an <br>
Alpha release and never making it past that :)<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Jonathan Wright<br>
KnownHost, LLC<br>
<a href="https://www.knownhost.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.knownhost.com</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@openvz.org" target="_blank">Users@openvz.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>