<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-06-03 17:14 GMT+03:00 Narcis Garcia <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:informatica@actiu.net" target="_blank">informatica@actiu.net</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">We still deploy OpenVZ/6 because we use Debian repositories.<br>
Our needings are covered with "oldstable" at all.<br>
I have no information about OpenVZ/7 binary repositories for Debian.<br>
<br>
<br>
El 03/06/16 a les 09:40, Corrado Fiore ha escrit:<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> Dear All,<br>
><br>
> we need to prepare a new setup composed of a few nodes (probably 5) for August this year.<br>
><br>
> If I interpreted the wii page correctly, the next VZ7 release will be a stable one. As you can imagine, we're very tempted to wait for it instead of deploying on OpenVZ and then migrating everything some months later.<br>
><br>
> The only problem is... we have no idea at all about the actual planned release date.<br>
><br>
> Can anyone shed some light on this? Even knowing the quarter (say, Q3 vs Q4) would be of great help to us.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It really depends on your hardware.</div><div><br></div><div>If you're using modern hardware I'd not recommend using CentOS 6/Debian Wheezy (OpenVZ old kernel).</div><div><br></div><div>VZ7 is still in beta, so using it in production is very risky.</div><div><br></div><div>Also, if you're using dm-crypt with Full Disk Encryption there might be a slowdown with 2.6.32 kernel because it doesn't support TRIM for encrypted devices.</div><div><br></div><div>I've been using myself OpenVZ for number of years and really don't like specific kernel binding (e.g. for OpenVZ 2.6.32 rhel6 and for VZ7 3.10 rhel7).</div><div><br></div><div>The only alternative for modern hardware (e.g. NVME PCI-E ssds or some modern SSDs) is to use upstream distro kernel with LXC/KVM.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
><br>
> (Disclaimer: I realise there are many factors involved, that stability comes at a price of a long(er) development time and I'm not asking for any commitment to an actual date. Just a few hints on 'how close we are' would be more than enough :-)<br>
><br>
> Thanks a lot,<br>
> Corrado Fiore<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Users@openvz.org">Users@openvz.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@openvz.org">Users@openvz.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>