<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/07/2014 06:21 PM, spameden wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAHCALexYU_+O+gHGWfbDdHPzO85J4bWCwGeRBqFvKtv1EgEwGA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>Btw, Kir, there is no version anymore in uname -a.<br>
            <br>
            Could you fix this at least to display current version, e.g.
            instead of:<br>
            <br>
            # uname -r<br>
            2.6.32-openvz-amd64<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          display:<br>
          # uname -r<br>
          2.6.32-openvz-042stab084.17-amd64<br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Again, it is the same as in stock Debian kernel. While their version
    is 3.2.54-2,<br>
    uname shows 3.2.0-4.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAHCALexYU_+O+gHGWfbDdHPzO85J4bWCwGeRBqFvKtv1EgEwGA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>and also consider reverting to the old system if you can..<br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    Yeah, I guess I should do it, just waiting for someone who knows
    Debian<br>
    more than me to chime in.<br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAHCALexYU_+O+gHGWfbDdHPzO85J4bWCwGeRBqFvKtv1EgEwGA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2014-03-07 18:45 GMT+04:00 Narcis
          Garcia <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:informatica@actiu.net" target="_blank">informatica@actiu.net</a>&gt;</span>:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            I think that is a good strategy to have a main package to be
            manually<br>
            installed:<br>
            linux-image-openvz-amd64<br>
            linux-image-openvz-686<br>
            <br>
            But fully versioned as its dependencies (042stab084.26)<br>
            And with a dependency to a version-named package, such as:<br>
            linux-image-2.6.32-42.84.26-openvz-amd64<br>
            <br>
            In this way, upgrading the main package this will install
            the new<br>
            versions of dependencies. I think that this is the way
            Debian works, and<br>
            this allows to have old and new files installed
            simultaneously.<br>
            <br>
            To have the old and new kernels allow to test new one before
            removing<br>
            old one.<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            El 07/03/14 02:28, Kir Kolyshkin ha escrit:<br>
            <div class="">&gt; On 03/02/2014 02:01 PM, spameden wrote:<br>
              &gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt;<br>
            </div>
            <div class="">&gt;&gt; 2014-03-03 0:38 GMT+04:00 Ola
              Lundqvist &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:ola@inguza.com">ola@inguza.com</a><br>
            </div>
            &gt;&gt; &lt;mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:ola@inguza.com">ola@inguza.com</a>&gt;&gt;:<br>
            <div class="">&gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Hi<br>
              &gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Problem fixed now.<br>
              &gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; I had fixed the problem temporarily, but I
              had forgotten to<br>
              &gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; upgrade to the debarchiver version with the
              fix so it will not<br>
              &gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; happen again. Now I have done the upgrade and
              fixed the problem<br>
              &gt;&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; properly.<br>
              &gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt; I think it's not fixed properly:<br>
              &gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt; 1) wrong version of linux-image:<br>
              &gt;&gt; # dpkg -l|grep linux-image-openvz<br>
              &gt;&gt; ii &nbsp;linux-image-openvz-amd64<br>
              &gt;&gt; 042+1 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; amd64 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;OpenVZ
              Linux kernel<br>
              &gt;&gt; (meta-package)<br>
              &gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt; 2) # ls /boot |grep openvz<br>
              &gt;&gt; config-2.6.32-openvz-042stab084.17-amd64<br>
            </div>
            &gt;&gt; *config-2.6.32-openvz-amd64*<br>
            &gt;&gt; initrd.img-2.6.32-openvz-042stab084.17-amd64<br>
            &gt;&gt; *initrd.img-2.6.32-openvz-amd64*<br>
            &gt;&gt; System.map-2.6.32-openvz-042stab084.17-amd64<br>
            &gt;&gt; *System.map-2.6.32-openvz-amd64*<br>
            &gt;&gt; vmlinuz-2.6.32-openvz-042stab084.17-amd64<br>
            &gt;&gt; *vmlinuz-2.6.32-openvz-amd64*<br>
            <div class="">&gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt; so now we are missing usual version here in the
              package.. that's<br>
              &gt;&gt; actually very bad ... can you look into it?<br>
              &gt;&gt;<br>
              &gt;&gt; many thanks.<br>
              &gt;<br>
            </div>
            <div class="">&gt; This is intentional, and I changed it
              after looking into how default<br>
              &gt; Debian kernel is packaged/versioned.<br>
              &gt;<br>
              &gt; If you take a look, they have [meta]package
              linux-image-amd64 which requires<br>
              &gt; package linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64. The latter
              (currently) has a version of<br>
              &gt; 3.2.54-2 and this version is changed (incremented)
              with every release, while<br>
              &gt; package name stays the same
              (linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64). Also, vzkernel<br>
              &gt; name stays the same -- it is
              /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-amd64 in different<br>
              &gt; versions.<br>
              &gt; I am using the very same approach now for OpenVZ
              kernels.<br>
              &gt;<br>
            </div>
            <div class="">&gt; Previously I was adding the VZ version
              (i.e. 042stab0xy.z) into kernel<br>
              &gt; package name,<br>
              &gt; and it was added to vmlinuz and the /lib/modules
              directory name as well.<br>
            </div>
            <div class="">&gt; The problem<br>
              &gt; is, you need to specify a different dependency in<br>
              &gt; linux-image-openvz-amd64 metapackage,<br>
              &gt; and apt-get upgrade complains that it can't upgrade
              the system since a<br>
              &gt; new version<br>
              &gt; of an installed package (linux-image-amd64) requires
              a package that is<br>
              &gt; not installed yet.<br>
              &gt; The problem could be fixed by running dist-upgrade,
              but eventually I<br>
              &gt; decided that<br>
              &gt; this message is a hint that I package openvz kernels
              improperly, that<br>
              &gt; lead me to<br>
              &gt; looking into a way standard Debian kernels are
              packaged and implementing it<br>
              &gt; the same way for OpenVZ kernels.<br>
              &gt;<br>
            </div>
            <div class="">&gt; I am not a Debian guru and am very open
              to suggestions on how to improve<br>
              &gt; this.<br>
              &gt; Perhaps we can return to the older versioning scheme
              and ask people to<br>
              &gt; use dist-upgrade.<br>
              &gt; Or maybe I am totally missing something. Please help.<br>
              &gt;<br>
            </div>
            &gt; Kir.<br>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">&gt;<br>
                &gt;<br>
                &gt;<br>
                &gt; _______________________________________________<br>
                &gt; Users mailing list<br>
                &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Users@openvz.org">Users@openvz.org</a><br>
                &gt; <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users"
                  target="_blank">https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
                &gt;<br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                Users mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Users@openvz.org">Users@openvz.org</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users"
                  target="_blank">https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Users@openvz.org">Users@openvz.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users">https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>