Much thanks for your help <span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:collapse;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-weight:bold;white-space:nowrap">lst_hoe02<img src="cid:332@goomoji.gmail" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0.2ex; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0.2ex; vertical-align: middle; " goomoji="332"></span><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/12/22 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lst_hoe02@kwsoft.de">lst_hoe02@kwsoft.de</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">Zitat von shule ney <<a href="mailto:neyshule@gmail.com" target="_blank">neyshule@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
Thanks very much lst_hoe02, if I'm using kernel-2.6.24 which uses CFS<br></div>
scheduler with nanosecond *granularity, processes *across* different<br>
containers/groups should also have this * *granularity all right? *<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
To my knowledge OpenVZ does not alter the scheduler, but only priorities. So yes it should work, but others may have more insight then me.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
Andreas<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Users@openvz.org">Users@openvz.org</a><br>
<a href="https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>