[Users] Status of OVZ 8 & 9
Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT
paulocoghi at gmail.com
Thu Feb 2 05:53:46 MSK 2023
Hello Jake,
Thank you for your valuable feedback! Let's see what the Virtuozzo dev team
has to say about this issue with the GPG key for the "prlctl" tools.
By the way, last time I tried virsh with OpenVZ (version 8, at the time of
test), the experience was not good nor well documented as prlctl. But we
are already receiving the warning about prlctl being deprecated.
There are some niche cases in which virsh doesn't seem capable, like
setting "cpulimit".
Paulo Coghi
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 9:24 PM jjs - mainphrame <jjs at mainphrame.com> wrote:
> Everything was looking good, and I was considering installing ovz 9 on a
> physical server, but I ran into a weird issue with the GPG keys when I
> tried to install prlctl:
>
> GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Virtuozzo-9 (0x463278F2) is
> already installed
> The GPG keys listed for the "OpenVZ" repository are already installed but
> they are not correct for this package.
> Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository..
> Failing package is: prlctl-9.0.2-1.vz9.x86_64
> GPG Keys are configured as:
> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Virtuozzo-9
> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
> transaction.
> You can remove cached packages by executing 'yum clean packages'.
> Error: GPG check FAILED
>
> Jake
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 9:21 AM jjs - mainphrame <jjs at mainphrame.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The iso is indeed a new image.
>>
>> I've installed it in a VM and have been poking around, looks promising so
>> far, creating a few containers and taking them for a spin.
>>
>> Jake
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:21 PM jjs - mainphrame <jjs at mainphrame.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Downloading, will investigate.
>>>
>>> Jake
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:11 PM Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT <
>>> paulocoghi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What about this one, dated 27-Jan-2023?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/factory9/x86_64/iso/openvz-iso-9.0.1-383.iso
>>>>
>>>> Paulo Coghi
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:07 PM jjs - mainphrame <jjs at mainphrame.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I downloaded the vz9.iso and mounted it, and all the files are dated
>>>>> Feb 2 2022.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, no joy, despite the deceptive Dec 2022 date on the iso.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jake
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:38 AM jehan Procaccia <
>>>>> jehan.procaccia at imtbs-tsp.eu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> actually I wonder if openvz-iso-9:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/9.0/x86_64/iso/
>>>>>> <https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/9.0/x86_64/iso/>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *openvz-iso-9.0.0.iso 24-Feb-2022 04:41 2.9G*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which is supposed to be the base reference for virtuozzo 9 ,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is the same as
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://repo.virtuozzo.com/vz/releases/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *vz9.iso 20-Dec-2022 12:31 2G*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please let us know which .iso we should start with to test vz9 (open
>>>>>> version)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> why haven't they the same date (Feb 2022 vs Dec 2022)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks .
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at openvz.org
>>>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20230202/7e6db3da/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list