[Users] Issues with kernel upgrade on Debian Wheezy

spameden spameden at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 09:39:56 PDT 2014


2014-03-24 20:04 GMT+04:00 Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com>:

> Hi all, Ola
>
> I followed the recent discussion about OpenVZ kernel package management
> for Debian. While I don't really have a qualified opinion on the subject
> matter (personally, I slightly tend towards a new package for each
> release), let me mention problems with the current situation:
>
> * 'uname -r' does not print the actual version (This already has
>   been mentioned in the other thread)
>

Yes, I mentioned this before, thought it was fixed already..


>
> * If there is a problem with a kernel update, I cannot easily revert
>   to the previous version. At our institution, we experienced cases
>   where a switch to the previous kernel because of a bug was necessary.
>

+1


>
> * I'm trying to upgrade a machine right now from version 042stab084.26
>   to newest 042stab085.17. I do:
>
>   $ apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade
>
>   and I'm prompted with the following dialog:
>
>   $  Configuring linux-image-2.6.32-openvz-amd64
>   $  -------------------------------------------
>   $
>   $  You are attempting to install a kernel image (version
> 2.6.32-openvz-amd64) However, the directory
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-openvz-amd64/kernel still exists.  If this directory
> belongs to a previous linux-image-2.6.32-openvz-amd64
>   $  package, and if you have deselected some modules, or installed
> standalone modules packages, this could be bad.
>   $
>   $  If /lib/modules/2.6.32-openvz-amd64/kernel belongs to an old install
> of linux-image-2.6.32-openvz-amd64, then this is your last chance to abort
> the installation of this kernel image (nothing has been changed yet).
>   $
>   $  If you know what you are doing, and if you feel that this image
> should be installed despite this anomaly, Please answer n to the question.
>   $
>   $  Otherwise, I suggest you move /lib/modules/2.6.32-openvz-amd64/kernel
> out of the way, perhaps to /lib/modules/2.6.32-openvz-amd64.kernel.old or
> something, and then try re-installing this image.
>   $
>   $  Stop install since the kernel-image is already installed?
>

Try removing  linux-image-2.6.32-openvz-amd64 metapackage.. and installing
by fetching speicifc release (e.g. apt-get install
linux-image-2.6.32-openvz-042stab085.17-amd64)

>
>   If Debian does in-place kernel upgrades (a.k.a keeping the package
>   name while upgrading the kernel), they managed to never bother the
>   user with a question like this. I certainly know too little about
>   kernel package management to be of any help,  but to me that dialog
>   indicates that something is still odd.
>
>
> Those issues might be solved while sticking to the in-place upgrade
> scheme and are not necessarily an argument against it. I just wanted to
> mention them.
>

Good point. I think we should stick to the old scheme it was well tested
and was working for nearly everyone.


>
> Ranting aside, I am more than happy to see someone puts the effort into
> making all the great OpenVZ software easily accessible for Debian
> systems. For Debian, the situation has never been better before. Thanks
> a lot for that work.
>
> Roman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140324/a6230718/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list