[Users] Heavy Disk IO from a single VM can block the other VMs
on the same host
Hubert Krause
hubert.krause at inform-software.com
Tue Dec 6 12:18:08 EST 2011
Hello Kirill,
Am Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:27:49 +0400
schrieb Kirill Korotaev <dev at parallels.com>:
> That's most likely due to a single file system used for containers -
> journal becomes a bottleneck. fsync forces journal flushes and other
> workloads begin to wait for journal... In reality workload looks like
> this are typical for heavy loaded databases or mail systems only.
>
> How to improve:
> - increase journal size
> - split file systems, i.e. run each container from it's own file
> system
I've created another lv with an ext4 filesystem with maximum
journal-size and mounted this filesystem
under /var/lib/vz/private/<VID>. I will call this vm as VM-sep. All
other vhosts where kept inside the volume as before. Than I
start stressing the VM-sep and tested the impact to the other VMs. It
was exactly the same as if I run all VMs on the same partition.
There was indeed a difference, when I stress the Host itself. If I do
filesystem stress in the same Partition (/var/lib/vz) The perfomance of
VM is much worse (similar to stress in a VM, a little better) than if I
would stress in a completly different Partition (/var/tmp in my case)
To get some Numbers: (not very sientific, but good for a measure)
Throughput of a Webserver in a VM called VM-web in KB/s:
* without stress 101.9
* stress /var/tmp on host 24.3
* stress /var/lib/vz on Host 10.5
* stress a vm, not VM-web, same fs 8.3
* stress VM-sep 7.6
Maybe the Diskencryption plays a role, maybe there is something in the
VM-Isolation layer, I have no clue.
But as you mentione before this workload is typical for heavy
loaded databases or mail systems only. Neither of this application will
run in my vm-environment. So I will ignore this.
Greetings,
Hubert
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 20:13 , Hubert Krause wrote:
> > my environment is a Debian squeeze host with a few debian squeeze
> > guests. The private and root filesystems of the guest are locatet on
> > the same raid device (raid5) in an luksCrypt Container in an LVM
> > container on an ext4 partition with nodelalloc as mountoption. If I
> > run the tool stress:
> >
> > stress --io 5 --hdd 5 --timeout 60s (which means fork 5 threads
> > doing read/write access and 5 threads doing constantly fsync) the
> > responsivness of the other VMs is very bad. That means, Isolation
> > for IO operations is not given. I've tried to reduce the impact of
> > the VM with 'vzctl set VID --ioprio=0'. There was only a
> > minor effect, my application on the other VM where still not
> > responsive.
> >
> > Any Idea how to prevent a single VM to disturb the other VMs
> > regarding diskIO?
--
Dr. Hubert Krause
Geschäftsbereich Risk & Fraud
INFORM GmbH, Pascalstr. 23, 52076 Aachen, Germany
Tel. (+49)2408 9456 5145
e-mail: hubert.krause at inform-software.com,
http://www.inform-software.de/ INFORM Institut fur Operations Research
und Management GmbH Registered AmtsG Aachen HRB1144 Gfhr.Adrian Weiler
More information about the Users
mailing list