From: Dave Hansen <[email-masked]>

It is OK to let access() go without using a mnt_want/drop_write()
pair because it doesn't actually do writes to the filesystem,
and it is inherently racy anyway.  This is a rare case when it is
OK to use __mnt_is_readonly() directly.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email-masked]>

---
 fs/open.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2-robindmount/fs/open.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.22-rc4-mm2-robindmount.orig/fs/open.c
+++ 2.6.22-rc4-mm2-robindmount/fs/open.c
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_faccessat(int dfd, c
 	   special_file(nd.dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
 		goto out_path_release;
 
-	if(IS_RDONLY(nd.dentry->d_inode))
+	if(__mnt_is_readonly(nd.mnt))
 		res = -EROFS;
 
 out_path_release:

-- 
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email-masked]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers