[Devel] [PATCH vz9 v1 06/63] dm-ploop: convert enospc handling to use lockless lists
Pavel Tikhomirov
ptikhomirov at virtuozzo.com
Mon Feb 3 09:01:51 MSK 2025
> @@ -166,7 +171,6 @@ static bool ploop_try_delay_enospc(struct ploop_rq *prq, struct pio *pio)
> bool delayed = true;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&ploop->deferred_lock, flags);
> if (unlikely(ploop->wants_suspend)) {
> delayed = false;
> goto unlock;
> @@ -176,10 +180,11 @@ static bool ploop_try_delay_enospc(struct ploop_rq *prq, struct pio *pio)
>
> pr_err_once(PL_FMT("underlying disk is almost full"),
> ploop_device_name(ploop));
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ploop->deferred_lock, flags);
> ploop->event_enospc = true;
> - list_add_tail(&pio->list, &ploop->enospc_pios);
> -unlock:
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ploop->deferred_lock, flags);
> + llist_add((struct llist_node *)(&pio->list), &ploop->enospc_pios);
> +unlock:
>
> if (delayed)
> mod_timer(&ploop->enospc_timer, jiffies + PLOOP_ENOSPC_TIMEOUT);
Can you please explain why we need to take defered_lock around
ploop->event_enospc setting after your patch? (It looks that this lock
does not do anything now.)
More information about the Devel
mailing list