[Devel] [PATCH RH9 19/28] fs/super: don't destroy super_block in case of leaked inodes

[Andrey Zhadchenko]

From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin at virtuozzo.com>

In case of leaked inode don't destroy superblock to decrease
possibility of crash.

https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-95177
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin at virtuozzo.com>

(cherry picked from vz7 commit 1e96054ee10b ("fs/super: don't destroy
super_block in case of leaked inodes"))

Signed-off-by: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko at virtuozzo.com>

(cherry picked from vz8 commit 1239a87d573073462d4e2cecebc9a2e29095fa7b)
Signed-off-by: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko at virtuozzo.com>
---
 fs/super.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index d3f48cf..c306a6f 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -358,7 +358,15 @@ void deactivate_locked_super(struct super_block *s)
 		cleancache_invalidate_fs(s);
 		unregister_shrinker(&s->s_shrink);
 		fs->kill_sb(s);
-
+		if (!list_empty(&s->s_inodes)) {
+			pr_err("deactivate_locked_super: busy inodes...\n");
+			spin_lock(&sb_lock);
+			if (!--s->s_count)
+				list_del_init(&s->s_list);
+			spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
+			up_write(&s->s_umount);
+			return;
+		}
 		/*
 		 * Since list_lru_destroy() may sleep, we cannot call it from
 		 * put_super(), where we hold the sb_lock. Therefore we destroy
-- 
1.8.3.1