[Devel] [PATCH RHEL9 COMMIT] ms/memcg: prohibit unconditional exceeding the limit of dying tasks
Konstantin Khorenko
khorenko at virtuozzo.com
Fri Nov 12 20:30:30 MSK 2021
The commit is pushed to "branch-rh9-5.14.vz9.1.x-ovz" and will appear at https://src.openvz.org/scm/ovz/vzkernel.git
after rh9-5.14.0-4.vz9.10.26
------>
commit a1e040f0087ce7f7086e68d41a0e396277795c5f
Author: Vasily Averin <vvs at virtuozzo.com>
Date: Fri Nov 12 20:30:30 2021 +0300
ms/memcg: prohibit unconditional exceeding the limit of dying tasks
Memory cgroup charging allows killed or exiting tasks to exceed the hard
limit. It is assumed that the amount of the memory charged by those
tasks is bound and most of the memory will get released while the task
is exiting. This is resembling a heuristic for the global OOM situation
when tasks get access to memory reserves. There is no global memory
shortage at the memcg level so the memcg heuristic is more relieved.
The above assumption is overly optimistic though. E.g. vmalloc can
scale to really large requests and the heuristic would allow that. We
used to have an early break in the vmalloc allocator for killed tasks
but this has been reverted by commit b8c8a338f75e ("Revert "vmalloc:
back off when the current task is killed""). There are likely other
similar code paths which do not check for fatal signals in an
allocation&charge loop. Also there are some kernel objects charged to a
memcg which are not bound to a process life time.
It has been observed that it is not really hard to trigger these
bypasses and cause global OOM situation.
One potential way to address these runaways would be to limit the amount
of excess (similar to the global OOM with limited oom reserves). This
is certainly possible but it is not really clear how much of an excess
is desirable and still protects from global OOMs as that would have to
consider the overall memcg configuration.
This patch is addressing the problem by removing the heuristic
altogether. Bypass is only allowed for requests which either cannot
fail or where the failure is not desirable while excess should be still
limited (e.g. atomic requests). Implementation wise a killed or dying
task fails to charge if it has passed the OOM killer stage. That should
give all forms of reclaim chance to restore the limit before the failure
(ENOMEM) and tell the caller to back off.
In addition, this patch renames should_force_charge() helper to
task_is_dying() because now its use is not associated witch forced
charging.
This patch depends on pagefault_out_of_memory() to not trigger
out_of_memory(), because then a memcg failure can unwind to VM_FAULT_OOM
and cause a global OOM killer.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8f5cebbb-06da-4902-91f0-6566fc4b4203@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs at virtuozzo.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes at cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev at gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro at fb.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki at gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka at suse.cz>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb at google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman at techsingularity.net>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel at i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-134774
(cherry picked from commit a4ebf1b6ca1e011289677239a2a361fde4a88076)
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs at virtuozzo.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 27 ++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 19a5638ce1dc..fb047d0da227 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ enum res_type {
iter != NULL; \
iter = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, iter, NULL))
-static inline bool should_force_charge(void)
+static inline bool task_is_dying(void)
{
return tsk_is_oom_victim(current) || fatal_signal_pending(current) ||
(current->flags & PF_EXITING);
@@ -1690,7 +1690,7 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
* A few threads which were not waiting at mutex_lock_killable() can
* fail to bail out. Therefore, check again after holding oom_lock.
*/
- ret = should_force_charge() || out_of_memory(&oc);
+ ret = task_is_dying() || out_of_memory(&oc);
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
@@ -2704,6 +2704,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
struct page_counter *counter;
enum oom_status oom_status;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
+ bool passed_oom = false;
bool may_swap = true;
bool drained = false;
unsigned long pflags;
@@ -2738,15 +2739,6 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_ATOMIC)
goto force;
- /*
- * Unlike in global OOM situations, memcg is not in a physical
- * memory shortage. Allow dying and OOM-killed tasks to
- * bypass the last charges so that they can exit quickly and
- * free their memory.
- */
- if (unlikely(should_force_charge()))
- goto force;
-
/*
* Prevent unbounded recursion when reclaim operations need to
* allocate memory. This might exceed the limits temporarily,
@@ -2804,8 +2796,9 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL)
goto nomem;
- if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
- goto force;
+ /* Avoid endless loop for tasks bypassed by the oom killer */
+ if (passed_oom && task_is_dying())
+ goto nomem;
/*
* keep retrying as long as the memcg oom killer is able to make
@@ -2814,14 +2807,10 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
*/
oom_status = mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
get_order(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE));
- switch (oom_status) {
- case OOM_SUCCESS:
+ if (oom_status == OOM_SUCCESS) {
+ passed_oom = true;
nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
goto retry;
- case OOM_FAILED:
- goto force;
- default:
- goto nomem;
}
nomem:
if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
More information about the Devel
mailing list