[Devel] [PATCH RH7 3/5] ext4: handle unwritten or delalloc buffers before enabling data journaling
Kirill Tkhai
ktkhai at virtuozzo.com
Tue Jun 22 19:19:29 MSK 2021
From: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong at samsung.com>
ms commit 4c54659269ec
We already allocate delalloc blocks before changing the inode mode into
"per-file data journal" mode to prevent delalloc blocks from remaining
not allocated, but another issue concerned with "BH_Unwritten" status
still exists. For example, by fallocate(), several buffers' status
change into "BH_Unwritten", but these buffers cannot be processed by
ext4_alloc_da_blocks(). So, they still remain in unwritten status after
per-file data journaling is enabled and they cannot be changed into
written status any more and, if they are journaled and eventually
checkpointed, these unwritten buffer will cause a kernel panic by the
below BUG_ON() function of submit_bh_wbc() when they are submitted
during checkpointing.
static int submit_bh_wbc(int rw, struct buffer_head *bh,...
{
...
BUG_ON(buffer_unwritten(bh));
Moreover, when "dioread_nolock" option is enabled, the status of a
buffer is changed into "BH_Unwritten" after write_begin() completes and
the "BH_Unwritten" status will be cleared after I/O is done. Therefore,
if a buffer's status is changed into unwrutten but the buffer's I/O is
not submitted and completed, it can cause the same problem after
enabling per-file data journaling. You can easily generate this bug by
executing the following command.
./kvm-xfstests -C 10000 -m nodelalloc,dioread_nolock generic/269
To resolve these problems and define a boundary between the previous
mode and per-file data journaling mode, we need to flush and wait all
the I/O of buffers of a file before enabling per-file data journaling
of the file.
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong at samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso at mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 5fe702659e91..57d37866e7bc 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -5612,22 +5612,29 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val)
return 0;
if (is_journal_aborted(journal))
return -EROFS;
- /* We have to allocate physical blocks for delalloc blocks
- * before flushing journal. otherwise delalloc blocks can not
- * be allocated any more. even more truncate on delalloc blocks
- * could trigger BUG by flushing delalloc blocks in journal.
- * There is no delalloc block in non-journal data mode.
- */
- if (val && test_opt(inode->i_sb, DELALLOC)) {
- err = ext4_alloc_da_blocks(inode);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
- }
/* Wait for all existing dio workers */
ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio(inode);
inode_dio_wait(inode);
+ /*
+ * Before flushing the journal and switching inode's aops, we have
+ * to flush all dirty data the inode has. There can be outstanding
+ * delayed allocations, there can be unwritten extents created by
+ * fallocate or buffered writes in dioread_nolock mode covered by
+ * dirty data which can be converted only after flushing the dirty
+ * data (and journalled aops don't know how to handle these cases).
+ */
+ if (val) {
+ down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
+ err = filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
+ ext4_inode_resume_unlocked_dio(inode);
+ return err;
+ }
+ }
+
jbd2_journal_lock_updates(journal);
/*
@@ -5652,6 +5659,8 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val)
ext4_set_aops(inode);
jbd2_journal_unlock_updates(journal);
+ if (val)
+ up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
ext4_inode_resume_unlocked_dio(inode);
/* Finally we can mark the inode as dirty. */
More information about the Devel
mailing list