[Devel] [PATCH v13 09/12] ve/cgroup: Implemented logic that uses 'cgroup->ve_owner' to run release_agent notifications.
Kirill Tkhai
ktkhai at virtuozzo.com
Tue Apr 21 11:14:29 MSK 2020
On 20.04.2020 15:13, Valeriy Vdovin wrote:
> release_agent_cgroup work will extract ve_owner information from each
> cgroup in it's list and run user mode helper under it's namespaces.
> Also some code was added to detect ve destruction and manage
> release_agent executions in this case.
>
> https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-83887
>
> Signed-off-by: Valeriy Vdovin <valeriy.vdovin at virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 6437344..7acdd01 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -5436,7 +5436,7 @@ void cgroup_release_agent(struct work_struct *work)
> char *argv[3], *envp[3];
> int i, err;
> char *pathbuf = NULL, *agentbuf = NULL;
> - struct cgroup *cgrp;
> + struct cgroup *cgrp, *root_cgrp;
>
> cgrp = list_entry(ve->release_list.next,
> struct cgroup,
> @@ -5447,8 +5447,24 @@ void cgroup_release_agent(struct work_struct *work)
> pathbuf = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pathbuf)
> goto continue_free;
> - if (cgroup_path(cgrp, pathbuf, PAGE_SIZE) < 0)
> + if (__cgroup_path(cgrp, pathbuf, PAGE_SIZE, 1) < 0)
> + goto continue_free;
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + root_cgrp = cgroup_get_local_root(cgrp);
> + /*
> + * At VE destruction root cgroup looses VE_ROOT flag.
> + * Because of that 'cgroup_get_local_root' will not see
> + * VE root and return host's root cgroup instead.
> + * We can detect this because we have a pointer to
> + * original ve coming from work argument.
> + * We do not want to execute VE's notifications on host,
> + * so in this case we skip.
> + */
> + if (rcu_dereference(root_cgrp->ve_owner) != ve) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> goto continue_free;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> agentbuf = kstrdup(cgrp->root->release_agent_path, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!agentbuf)
> goto continue_free;
> @@ -5468,8 +5484,11 @@ void cgroup_release_agent(struct work_struct *work)
> * since the exec could involve hitting disk and hence
> * be a slow process */
> mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> - err = call_usermodehelper(argv[0], argv, envp, UMH_WAIT_EXEC);
> - if (err < 0)
> +
> + err = call_usermodehelper_fns_ve(ve, argv[0], argv,
> + envp, UMH_WAIT_EXEC, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + if (err < 0 && ve != &ve0 &&
Why don't warn if ve == &ve0?
> + !(ve->init_task->flags & PF_EXITING))
> pr_warn_ratelimited("cgroup release_agent "
> "%s %s failed: %d\n",
> agentbuf, pathbuf, err);
>
More information about the Devel
mailing list