[Devel] [PATCH RHEL7 COMMIT] fs/fuse kio: style fix in pcs_fuse_submit()
Konstantin Khorenko
khorenko at virtuozzo.com
Tue May 21 19:02:18 MSK 2019
The commit is pushed to "branch-rh7-3.10.0-957.12.2.vz7.96.x-ovz" and will appear at https://src.openvz.org/scm/ovz/vzkernel.git
after rh7-3.10.0-957.12.2.vz7.96.1
------>
commit cfa4c65a60056582e47f0be550a7b9554dd23ad5
Author: Pavel Butsykin <pbutsykin at virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue May 21 19:02:16 2019 +0300
fs/fuse kio: style fix in pcs_fuse_submit()
This patch simplifies pcs_fuse_submit() a little bit by replacing &r->req with
req, because here it's the same pointer.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Butsykin <pbutsykin at virtuozzo.com>
=====================
Patchset description:
fix deadlock between synchronous reqs and fuse_invalidate_files
One more deadlock with fuse_invalidate_files():
[<ffffffff92ba7cc4>] __lock_page+0x74/0x90
[<ffffffff92bb9a75>] invalidate_inode_pages2_range+0x445/0x470
[<ffffffff92bb9ab7>] invalidate_inode_pages2+0x17/0x20
[<ffffffffc034cde5>] fuse_invalidate_files+0x235/0x270 [fuse]
[<ffffffffc033d3fb>] fuse_dev_do_write+0x7fb/0xe20 [fuse]
[<ffffffffc033ddc1>] fuse_dev_write+0x71/0xa0 [fuse]
[<ffffffff92c3c2e6>] do_sync_write+0x96/0xe0
[<ffffffff92c3cdc0>] vfs_write+0xc0/0x1f0
[<ffffffff92c3dbef>] SyS_write+0x7f/0xf0
[<ffffffff9315589b>] system_call_fastpath+0x22/0x27
This happened because synchronous kio read request was not dropped by kill_requests:
PID: 20684 TASK: ffff9543c2e71160 CPU: 5 COMMAND: "co_io"
[ffff9547b0faf9f8] __schedule at ffffffff93148a9f
[ffff9547b0fafa88] schedule at ffffffff93148fe9
[ffff9547b0fafa98] kpcs_req_send at ffffffffc047dab5 [fuse_kio_pcs]
[ffff9547b0fafb08] __fuse_request_send at ffffffffc033a987 [fuse]
[ffff9547b0fafb40] fuse_request_check_and_send at ffffffffc033e097 [fuse]
[ffff9547b0fafb50] fuse_send_read at ffffffffc03463ec [fuse]
[ffff9547b0fafb90] __fuse_readpage at ffffffffc03475ad [fuse]
[ffff9547b0fafc40] fuse_readpage at ffffffffc0347a3c [fuse]
[ffff9547b0fafca0] generic_file_read_iter at ffffffff92baa186
[ffff9547b0fafd58] generic_file_aio_read at ffffffff92baa5c5
[ffff9547b0fafdc0] fuse_file_aio_read at ffffffffc0343788 [fuse]
[ffff9547b0fafdf0] do_sync_read at ffffffff92c3c206
[ffff9547b0fafed0] vfs_read at ffffffff92c3cc2f
[ffff9547b0faff00] sys_pread64 at ffffffff92c3dcf2
[ffff9547b0faff50] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff9315589b
struct pcs_fuse_req {
req = {
list = {
next = 0xffff95479374eb18,
prev = 0xffff9547acf76e00
},
...
page_cache = 1,
page_needs_release = 0,
killed = 0,
...
ff = 0x0,
io_inode = 0xffff95445da0b740,
The fuse_file pointer was not initialized in req->ff, that means we can't check
ff->ff_state inside pcs_fuse_submit(), despite the fact that this request has
locked pages. It's believed that requests with an empty req->ff don't have pages,
therefore, such requests may not be synchronized with fuse_invalidate_files().
However, synchronous requests don't reference ff, but pass it as a parameter to
fuse_request_check_and_send().
This patchset fixes it.
https://pmc.acronis.com/browse/VSTOR-23034
Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai at virtuozzo.com>
Pavel Butsykin (4):
fs/fuse kio: forward fuse_file pointer to kpcs_req_send()
fs/fuse kio: add pending kio requests to kqueue
fs/fuse kio: style fix in pcs_fuse_submit()
fs/fuse kio: keep fuse_file for requests waiting for shrink
---
fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_fuse_kdirect.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_fuse_kdirect.c b/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_fuse_kdirect.c
index 245fdee569c2..cd3ec4897225 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_fuse_kdirect.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_fuse_kdirect.c
@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ static void pcs_fuse_submit(struct pcs_fuse_cluster *pfc, struct fuse_req *req,
ireq = &r->exec.ireq;
ireq_init(di, ireq);
- switch (r->req.in.h.opcode) {
+ switch (req->in.h.opcode) {
case FUSE_WRITE:
case FUSE_READ:
ret = pcs_fuse_prep_rw(r, ff);
@@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static void pcs_fuse_submit(struct pcs_fuse_cluster *pfc, struct fuse_req *req,
struct fuse_fallocate_in *inarg = (void*) req->in.args[0].value;
if (pfc->fc->no_fallocate) {
- r->req.out.h.error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ req->out.h.error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto error;
}
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static void pcs_fuse_submit(struct pcs_fuse_cluster *pfc, struct fuse_req *req,
WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&fi->inode.i_mutex));
if (inarg->mode & (FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE|FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)) {
if ((inarg->offset & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) || (inarg->length & (PAGE_SIZE - 1))) {
- r->req.out.h.error = -EINVAL;
+ req->out.h.error = -EINVAL;
goto error;
}
}
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static void pcs_fuse_submit(struct pcs_fuse_cluster *pfc, struct fuse_req *req,
goto submit;
case FUSE_IOCTL:
if (pfc->fc->no_fiemap) {
- r->req.out.h.error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ req->out.h.error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto error;
}
@@ -1022,13 +1022,13 @@ static void pcs_fuse_submit(struct pcs_fuse_cluster *pfc, struct fuse_req *req,
}
break;
}
- r->req.out.h.error = 0;
+ req->out.h.error = 0;
error:
- DTRACE("do fuse_request_end req:%p op:%d err:%d\n", &r->req, r->req.in.h.opcode, r->req.out.h.error);
+ DTRACE("do fuse_request_end req:%p op:%d err:%d\n", req, req->in.h.opcode, req->out.h.error);
if (lk)
spin_unlock(&pfc->fc->bg_lock);
- request_end(pfc->fc, &r->req);
+ request_end(pfc->fc, req);
if (lk)
spin_lock(&pfc->fc->bg_lock);
return;
More information about the Devel
mailing list