[Devel] [PATCH RFC 2/5] ms/vfs: grab the lock instead of blocking in __fd_install during resizing

Kirill Tkhai ktkhai at virtuozzo.com
Fri Jan 12 18:46:17 MSK 2018


From: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik at redhat.com>

ms commit: c02b1a9b41c2

Explicit locking in the fallback case provides a safe state of the
table. Getting rid of blocking semantics makes __fd_install usable
again in non-sleepable contexts, which easies backporting efforts.

There is a side effect of slightly nicer assembly for the common case
as might_sleep can now be removed.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/file.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index adc42eccfd67..05ff3c5a6ec8 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -586,13 +586,16 @@ void __fd_install(struct files_struct *files, unsigned int fd,
 {
 	struct fdtable *fdt;
 
-	might_sleep();
 	rcu_read_lock_sched();
 
-	while (unlikely(files->resize_in_progress)) {
+	if (unlikely(files->resize_in_progress)) {
 		rcu_read_unlock_sched();
-		wait_event(files->resize_wait, !files->resize_in_progress);
-		rcu_read_lock_sched();
+		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+		fdt = files_fdtable(files);
+		BUG_ON(fdt->fd[fd] != NULL);
+		rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], file);
+		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+		return;
 	}
 	/* coupled with smp_wmb() in expand_fdtable() */
 	smp_rmb();



More information about the Devel mailing list