[Devel] [PATCH RFC 2/5] ms/vfs: grab the lock instead of blocking in __fd_install during resizing
Kirill Tkhai
ktkhai at virtuozzo.com
Fri Jan 12 18:46:17 MSK 2018
From: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik at redhat.com>
ms commit: c02b1a9b41c2
Explicit locking in the fallback case provides a safe state of the
table. Getting rid of blocking semantics makes __fd_install usable
again in non-sleepable contexts, which easies backporting efforts.
There is a side effect of slightly nicer assembly for the common case
as might_sleep can now be removed.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/file.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index adc42eccfd67..05ff3c5a6ec8 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -586,13 +586,16 @@ void __fd_install(struct files_struct *files, unsigned int fd,
{
struct fdtable *fdt;
- might_sleep();
rcu_read_lock_sched();
- while (unlikely(files->resize_in_progress)) {
+ if (unlikely(files->resize_in_progress)) {
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
- wait_event(files->resize_wait, !files->resize_in_progress);
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+ fdt = files_fdtable(files);
+ BUG_ON(fdt->fd[fd] != NULL);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], file);
+ spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+ return;
}
/* coupled with smp_wmb() in expand_fdtable() */
smp_rmb();
More information about the Devel
mailing list