[Devel] [PATCH vz7 39/46] fuse: abort: no fc->lock needed for request ending
Maxim Patlasov
mpatlasov at virtuozzo.com
Fri Mar 24 19:28:26 PDT 2017
Backport from ml:
commit ee314a870e402f4e63b8a651bc96c740ed69cb31
Author: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi at suse.cz>
Date: Wed Jul 1 16:26:08 2015 +0200
fuse: abort: no fc->lock needed for request ending
In fuse_abort_conn() when all requests are on private lists we no longer
need fc->lock protection.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi at suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant at oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov at virtuozzo.com>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 14 +++++---------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index 16e2be9..70694ed 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -2067,8 +2067,6 @@ static unsigned fuse_dev_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
* This function releases and reacquires fc->lock
*/
static void end_requests(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct list_head *head)
-__releases(fc->lock)
-__acquires(fc->lock)
{
while (!list_empty(head)) {
struct fuse_req *req;
@@ -2077,9 +2075,7 @@ __acquires(fc->lock)
clear_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags);
clear_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags);
list_del_init(&req->list);
- spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
request_end(fc, req);
- spin_lock(&fc->lock);
}
}
@@ -2155,20 +2151,20 @@ void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
wake_up_all_locked(&fiq->waitq);
spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
kill_fasync(&fiq->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+ end_polls(fc);
+ wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq);
+ spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
while (!list_empty(&to_end1)) {
req = list_first_entry(&to_end1, struct fuse_req, list);
__fuse_get_request(req);
list_del_init(&req->list);
- spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
request_end(fc, req);
- spin_lock(&fc->lock);
}
end_requests(fc, &to_end2);
- end_polls(fc);
- wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq);
+ } else {
+ spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
}
- spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_abort_conn);
More information about the Devel
mailing list