[Devel] [PATCH 3/3] net: do iptables restore in ve0

[Stanislav Kinsburskiy]

25.07.2017 09:48, Andrey Vagin пишет:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:37:52PM -0700, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
>>
>>
>> 24 июля 2017 г. 7:12 PM пользователь Kirill Gorkunov <gorcunov at virtuozzo.com>
>> написал:
>>
>>     On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 07:09:39PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
>>     >
>>     >    Well, no. I don't like this defines.
>>     >    And I don't think that pid has to be explicitly provided. At least for
>>     >    ve0.
>>     >    But frankly, I don't want to do it anyways.
>>
>>     Man, it happened that cgroup interace works with pid ;)
>>
>>
>> It doesn't matter.
>> Do you see pid in this line:
>> # ls /sys/fs/cgroup/ve/tasks
> 
> You don't understand the meaning of this pid:
> 
> echo $pid > /sys/fs/cgroup/ve/tasks
> 

True. I don't.
If I want to move current process into VE#0, I don't need any pid. But that's what I've said before.
But we don't need any pid even when we want to move to VE#X.
Because current VE number has to be set in environment. And if not - it (again) has to.
And this approach make thing very simple.
And there won't be any basis for such questions like you had, when started this conversations.
Agreed?