[Devel] [PATCH] vz6 ext4: Discard preallocated block before swap_extents
Dmitry Monakhov
dmonakhov at openvz.org
Mon Feb 27 03:34:12 PST 2017
Vasily Averin <vvs at virtuozzo.com> writes:
> Dima,
> please take look at comment below.
>
> On 2017-02-25 18:16, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> Inode preallocation consists of two parts (used and unused) fully controlled
>> by inode, so it must be discarded before swap extents.
>> Currently we may skip drop_preallocation if file is sparse.
>>
>> This patch does:
>> - Moves ext4_discard_preallocations to ext4_swap_extents.
>> This makes more readable and reliable for future changes.
>> - Cleanup main move_extent loop
>>
>> https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-57003
>> xfstests:ext4/024 (pended: https://github.com/dmonakhov/xfstests/commit/7a4763963f73ea5d5bba45eefa484494aa3df7cf)
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov at openvz.org>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/extents.c | 3 +++
>> fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 17 +++++++----------
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> index 85c4d4e..fd49ab0 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> @@ -4371,6 +4371,9 @@ ext4_swap_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode1,
>> BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&inode1->i_mutex));
>> BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&inode1->i_mutex));
>>
>> + ext4_discard_preallocations(inode1);
>> + ext4_discard_preallocations(inode2);
>> +
>> while (count) {
>> struct ext4_extent *ex1, *ex2, tmp_ex;
>> ext4_lblk_t e1_blk, e2_blk;
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
>> index 39eaa8f..97a7db5 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
>> @@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
>> ext4_lblk_t o_end, o_start = orig_blk;
>> ext4_lblk_t d_start = donor_blk;
>> int ret;
>> + __u64 m_len = *moved_len;
>>
>> if (orig_inode->i_sb != donor_inode->i_sb) {
>> ext4_debug("ext4 move extent: The argument files "
>> @@ -696,7 +697,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
>> if (next_blk == EXT_MAX_BLOCKS) {
>> o_start = o_end;
>> ret = -ENODATA;
>> - goto out;
>> + break;
>> }
>> d_start += next_blk - o_start;
>> o_start = next_blk;
>> @@ -708,7 +709,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
>> o_start = cur_blk;
>> /* Extent inside requested range ?*/
>> if (cur_blk >= o_end)
>> - goto out;
>> + break;
>> } else { /* in_range(o_start, o_blk, o_len) */
>> cur_len += cur_blk - o_start;
>> }
>> @@ -743,6 +744,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
>> break;
>> o_start += cur_len;
>> d_start += cur_len;
>> + m_len += cur_len;
>> repeat:
>> if (path) {
>> ext4_ext_drop_refs(path);
>> @@ -755,15 +757,10 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
>> *moved_len = len;
>>
>> out:
>> - if (*moved_len) {
>> - ext4_discard_preallocations(orig_inode);
>> - ext4_discard_preallocations(donor_inode);
>> - }
>> + WARN_ON(m_len > len);
>> + if (ret == 0)
>> + *moved_len = m_len;
>>
>> - if (path) {
>> - ext4_ext_drop_refs(path);
>> - kfree(path);
>> - }
>
> I do not understand why kfree for path is dropped here.
> Rest places looks reasonable for me,
> but this one looks like some mistake.
Yes, this is copy-paste mistake. Please see updated verstion
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov at openvz.org>
To: devel at openvz.org
Cc: dmonakhov at openvz.org,
vvs at virtuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH] vz6 ext4: Discard preallocated block before swap_extents v2
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:33:07 +0400
Message-Id: <1488195187-26606-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov at openvz.org>
>
> Take a look -- path is still was freed inside cycle,
> why it should not be freed at finish too?
>
>> up_write(&EXT4_I(orig_inode)->i_data_sem);
>> up_write(&EXT4_I(donor_inode)->i_data_sem);
>> up_write(&orig_inode->i_alloc_sem);
>>
More information about the Devel
mailing list