[Devel] [PATCH rh7] arch: x86: perf_event_intel: do not taint kernel when irq loop is stuck
Vladimir Davydov
vdavydov at virtuozzo.com
Thu Jul 14 06:59:54 PDT 2016
Presumably, this happens in case a perf counter overflows. This might be
a hardware bug, which needs a workaround. We don't have enough knowledge
to fix it or investigate further. Since the issue is rare and can't lead
to system crash, we can close our eye on it. Nevertheless, it taints the
kernel, which results in test failure. To avoid that, let's replace WARN
with pr_warn.
https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-49258
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov at virtuozzo.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 5106e8378d96..9f2a12e5e553 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1579,8 +1579,13 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
again:
intel_pmu_ack_status(status);
if (++loops > 100) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "perfevents: irq loop stuck!\n");
- perf_event_print_debug();
+ static bool warned = false;
+ if (!warned) {
+ pr_warn("perfevents: irq loop stuck!\n");
+ dump_stack();
+ perf_event_print_debug();
+ warned = true;
+ }
intel_pmu_reset();
goto done;
}
--
2.1.4
More information about the Devel
mailing list