[Devel] [PATCH rh7] cfq-iosched: remove @gfp_mask from cfq_find_alloc_queue() -v2
Maxim Patlasov
mpatlasov at virtuozzo.com
Thu Oct 8 17:29:31 PDT 2015
Backport 2da8de0bb from mainline. Original patch description:
Even when allocations fail, cfq_find_alloc_queue() always returns a
valid cfq_queue by falling back to the oom cfq_queue. As such, there
isn't much point in taking @gfp_mask and trying "harder" if __GFP_WAIT
is set. GFP_NOWAIT allocations don't fail often and even when they do
the degraded behavior is acceptable and temporary.
After all, the only reason get_request(), which ultimately determines
the gfp_mask, cares about __GFP_WAIT is to guarantee request
allocation, assuming IO forward progress, for callers which are
willing to wait. There's no reason for cfq_find_alloc_queue() to
behave differently on __GFP_WAIT when it already has a fallback
mechanism.
Remove @gfp_mask from cfq_find_alloc_queue() and propagate the changes
to its callers. This simplifies the function quite a bit and will
help making async queues per-cfq_group.
v2: Updated to reflect GFP_ATOMIC -> GPF_NOWAIT.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer at redhat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com>
Cc: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe at fb.com>
Changed in v2:
- v1 was for rh6 kernel - ignore it
https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-39956
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 46 ++++++++++------------------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
-------------- next part --------------
Backport 2da8de0bb from mainline. Original patch description:
Even when allocations fail, cfq_find_alloc_queue() always returns a
valid cfq_queue by falling back to the oom cfq_queue. As such, there
isn't much point in taking @gfp_mask and trying "harder" if __GFP_WAIT
is set. GFP_NOWAIT allocations don't fail often and even when they do
the degraded behavior is acceptable and temporary.
After all, the only reason get_request(), which ultimately determines
the gfp_mask, cares about __GFP_WAIT is to guarantee request
allocation, assuming IO forward progress, for callers which are
willing to wait. There's no reason for cfq_find_alloc_queue() to
behave differently on __GFP_WAIT when it already has a fallback
mechanism.
Remove @gfp_mask from cfq_find_alloc_queue() and propagate the changes
to its callers. This simplifies the function quite a bit and will
help making async queues per-cfq_group.
v2: Updated to reflect GFP_ATOMIC -> GPF_NOWAIT.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer at redhat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com>
Cc: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe at fb.com>
https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-39956
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 46 ++++++++++------------------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 1d7fce9..987c0f9 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -860,8 +860,7 @@ static inline int cfqg_busy_async_queues(struct cfq_data *cfqd,
static void cfq_dispatch_insert(struct request_queue *, struct request *);
static struct cfq_queue *cfq_get_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, bool is_sync,
- struct cfq_io_cq *cic, struct bio *bio,
- gfp_t gfp_mask);
+ struct cfq_io_cq *cic, struct bio *bio);
static inline struct cfq_io_cq *icq_to_cic(struct io_cq *icq)
{
@@ -3569,8 +3568,7 @@ static void check_ioprio_changed(struct cfq_io_cq *cic, struct bio *bio)
cfqq = cic->cfqq[BLK_RW_ASYNC];
if (cfqq) {
struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq;
- new_cfqq = cfq_get_queue(cfqd, BLK_RW_ASYNC, cic, bio,
- GFP_ATOMIC);
+ new_cfqq = cfq_get_queue(cfqd, BLK_RW_ASYNC, cic, bio);
if (new_cfqq) {
cic->cfqq[BLK_RW_ASYNC] = new_cfqq;
cfq_put_queue(cfqq);
@@ -3641,13 +3639,12 @@ static inline void check_blkcg_changed(struct cfq_io_cq *cic, struct bio *bio) {
static struct cfq_queue *
cfq_find_alloc_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, bool is_sync, struct cfq_io_cq *cic,
- struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+ struct bio *bio)
{
struct blkcg *blkcg;
- struct cfq_queue *cfqq, *new_cfqq = NULL;
+ struct cfq_queue *cfqq;
struct cfq_group *cfqg;
-retry:
rcu_read_lock();
blkcg = bio_blkcg(bio);
@@ -3659,27 +3656,9 @@ retry:
* originally, since it should just be a temporary situation.
*/
if (!cfqq || cfqq == &cfqd->oom_cfqq) {
- cfqq = NULL;
- if (new_cfqq) {
- cfqq = new_cfqq;
- new_cfqq = NULL;
- } else if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- spin_unlock_irq(cfqd->queue->queue_lock);
- new_cfqq = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cfq_pool,
- gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO,
- cfqd->queue->node);
- spin_lock_irq(cfqd->queue->queue_lock);
- if (new_cfqq)
- goto retry;
- else
- return &cfqd->oom_cfqq;
- } else {
- cfqq = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cfq_pool,
- gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO,
- cfqd->queue->node);
- }
-
+ cfqq = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cfq_pool,
+ GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO,
+ cfqd->queue->node);
if (cfqq) {
cfq_init_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, current->pid, is_sync);
cfq_init_prio_data(cfqq, cic);
@@ -3689,9 +3668,6 @@ retry:
cfqq = &cfqd->oom_cfqq;
}
- if (new_cfqq)
- kmem_cache_free(cfq_pool, new_cfqq);
-
rcu_read_unlock();
return cfqq;
}
@@ -3716,7 +3692,7 @@ cfq_async_queue_prio(struct cfq_data *cfqd, int ioprio_class, int ioprio)
static struct cfq_queue *
cfq_get_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, bool is_sync, struct cfq_io_cq *cic,
- struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+ struct bio *bio)
{
const int ioprio_class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(cic->ioprio);
const int ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(cic->ioprio);
@@ -3729,7 +3705,7 @@ cfq_get_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, bool is_sync, struct cfq_io_cq *cic,
}
if (!cfqq)
- cfqq = cfq_find_alloc_queue(cfqd, is_sync, cic, bio, gfp_mask);
+ cfqq = cfq_find_alloc_queue(cfqd, is_sync, cic, bio);
/*
* pin the queue now that it's allocated, scheduler exit will prune it
@@ -4280,8 +4256,6 @@ cfq_set_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
const bool is_sync = rq_is_sync(rq);
struct cfq_queue *cfqq;
- might_sleep_if(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT);
-
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
check_ioprio_changed(cic, bio);
@@ -4289,7 +4263,7 @@ cfq_set_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
new_queue:
cfqq = cic_to_cfqq(cic, is_sync);
if (!cfqq || cfqq == &cfqd->oom_cfqq) {
- cfqq = cfq_get_queue(cfqd, is_sync, cic, bio, gfp_mask);
+ cfqq = cfq_get_queue(cfqd, is_sync, cic, bio);
cic_set_cfqq(cic, cfqq, is_sync);
} else {
/*
More information about the Devel
mailing list