[Devel] [PATCH v2] ve/fs: add per-VE limit of mount points
Stanislav Kinsburskiy
skinsbursky at odin.com
Wed Nov 11 04:01:26 PST 2015
Thanks. That's much better.
But maybe we could simplify it even more?
Please, take a look at my comments inlined. They allow to reduce impact
to generic code even further and simplify future rebasing (which is
usually a lot of pain).
11.11.2015 10:33, Evgenii Shatokhin пишет:
> https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-34438
>
> (This fix was adapted from PCS6.)
>
> It is possible for a container to create lots of mount points, which may
> make operations with them slower. As some of these operations take
> global locks (namespace_sem, vfsmount_lock), it might affect other
> containers as well.
>
> Let us limit the maximum number of mount points a VE may create. The
> limit can be customized via /proc/sys/fs/ve-mount-nr knob.
>
> Changes in v.2:
>
> * The situations where VE0 mounts something and another VE unmounts it
> seem to be of no concern. If so, it is OK not to alter struct mount:
> the mount counter for a VE may become unbalanced but this is
> acceptable here.
>
> * The sysctl knob is now defined alongside other VE sysctls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin at odin.com>
> ---
> fs/namespace.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/ve.h | 6 ++++++
> kernel/ve/ve.c | 2 ++
> kernel/ve/veowner.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
> index 8909c13..264c0b5 100644
> --- a/fs/namespace.c
> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,15 @@ unsigned int mnt_get_count(struct mount *mnt)
>
/* Somewhere in our headers, or whatever other homebrew files */
static int ve_mount_allowed(void)
{
return get_exec_env()->mnt_nr < sysctl_ve_mount_nr;
}
> static struct mount *alloc_vfsmnt(const char *name)
> {
> - struct mount *mnt = kmem_cache_zalloc(mnt_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> + struct mount *mnt;
> + struct ve_struct *ve = get_exec_env();
> +
> + if (ve &&
> + atomic_add_return(1, &ve->mnt_nr) > sysctl_ve_mount_nr &&
> + !ve_is_super(ve))
> + goto out_mnt_nr_dec;
> +
+ if (!ve_mount_allowed())
+ return NULL;
> + mnt = kmem_cache_zalloc(mnt_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (mnt) {
> int err;
>
> @@ -201,7 +209,9 @@ static struct mount *alloc_vfsmnt(const char *name)
> #ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_fsnotify_marks);
> #endif
> - }
> + } else
> + goto out_mnt_nr_dec;
> +
+ ve->mnt_nr++;
With this we can grow above 4096, yes. But we anyway took this number
from out of nowhere, so I don't think we should really care about it.
> return mnt;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> @@ -212,6 +222,9 @@ out_free_id:
> mnt_free_id(mnt);
> out_free_cache:
> kmem_cache_free(mnt_cache, mnt);
> +out_mnt_nr_dec:
> + if (ve)
> + atomic_dec(&ve->mnt_nr);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -542,6 +555,11 @@ int sb_prepare_remount_readonly(struct super_block *sb)
>
> static void free_vfsmnt(struct mount *mnt)
> {
> + struct ve_struct *ve = get_exec_env();
> +
> + if (ve)
> + atomic_dec(&ve->mnt_nr);
> +
> kfree(mnt->mnt_devname);
> mnt_free_id(mnt);
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> diff --git a/include/linux/ve.h b/include/linux/ve.h
> index 86b95c3..02600ac 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ve.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ve.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,10 @@ struct ve_struct {
> unsigned long aio_nr;
> unsigned long aio_max_nr;
> #endif
> + /* Number of mounts. May become unbalanced if VE0 mounts something
> + * and the VE unmounts it. This is acceptable.
> + */
> + atomic_t mnt_nr;
Since we are exposing this counter to user, and it's compared with some
dummy "4096" value, we don't really care about exact result.
IOW, I doubt, that we require an atomic variable here.
Simple integer will be enough (especially if we take into account, that
word-related operations are anyway atomic in x86)
+ int mnt_nr;
> };
>
> struct ve_devmnt {
> @@ -145,6 +149,8 @@ extern int nr_ve;
> extern struct proc_dir_entry *proc_vz_dir;
> extern struct cgroup_subsys ve_subsys;
>
> +extern unsigned int sysctl_ve_mount_nr;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_VE_IPTABLES
> extern __u64 ve_setup_iptables_mask(__u64 init_mask);
> #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/ve/ve.c b/kernel/ve/ve.c
> index e9219e6..216608c 100644
> --- a/kernel/ve/ve.c
> +++ b/kernel/ve/ve.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct ve_struct ve0 = {
> #endif
> .sched_lat_ve.cur = &ve0_lat_stats,
> .init_cred = &init_cred,
> + .mnt_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ve0);
>
> @@ -653,6 +654,7 @@ do_init:
> ve->aio_nr = 0;
> ve->aio_max_nr = AIO_MAX_NR_DEFAULT;
> #endif
> + atomic_set(&ve->mnt_nr, 0);
+ ve->mnt_nr = 0;
>
> return &ve->css;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/ve/veowner.c b/kernel/ve/veowner.c
> index 316e4d0..1a7e735 100644
> --- a/kernel/ve/veowner.c
> +++ b/kernel/ve/veowner.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,14 @@ static void prepare_proc(void)
> int ve_xattr_policy = VE_XATTR_POLICY_ACCEPT;
> static int ve_area_access_check;
>
> +/*
> + * Operations with a big amount of mount points can require a lot of time.
> + * These operations take the global lock namespace_sem, so they can affect
> + * other containers. Let us allow no more than sysctl_ve_mount_nr mount
> + * points for a VE.
> + */
> +unsigned int sysctl_ve_mount_nr = 4096;
> +
> static struct ctl_table vz_fs_table[] = {
> {
> .procname = "ve-area-access-check",
> @@ -77,6 +85,13 @@ static struct ctl_table vz_fs_table[] = {
> .mode = 0644 | S_ISVTX,
> .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec_virtual,
> },
> + {
> + .procname = "ve-mount-nr",
> + .data = &sysctl_ve_mount_nr,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_ve_mount_nr),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> + },
> { 0 }
> };
>
More information about the Devel
mailing list