[Devel] [PATCH] ve/fs: add per-VE limit of mount points

Vladimir Davydov vdavydov at virtuozzo.com
Mon Nov 9 07:31:37 PST 2015


On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:23:34PM +0100, Stanislav Kinsburskiу wrote:
> 
> 9 нояб. 2015 г. 4:15 PM пользователь Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov at virtuozzo.com> написал:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 09.11.2015 15:13, Andrew Vagin пишет: 
> > > >On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 07:37:31PM +0300, Evgenii Shatokhin wrote: 
> > > >>05.11.2015 18:45, Konstantin Khorenko пишет: 
> > > >>>Zenya, 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>>1) an idea from Volodya Davydov: we can store the pointer to ve_struct, 
> > > >>>not the veid, 
> > > >>>    thus we'll eliminate possible races with veid reuse. 
> > > >>OK. 
> > > >>The main question is though, whether we should care about the situations 
> > > >>where something is mounted from a VE and umounted from VE0. If we should 
> > > >>not, it is not needed to change struct mount at all. 
> > > >We can't disable this operation, so I think we should. 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Could you elaborate on this, please? 
> > > Why should we care about such situations? 
> >
> > external bind mounts are mounted from ve0 and can be unmounted from 
> > inside ve 
> 
> Ок. But what problems it could bring?

Unbalanced mnt_nr


More information about the Devel mailing list