[Devel] [PATCH] ve/fs: add per-VE limit of mount points
Vladimir Davydov
vdavydov at virtuozzo.com
Mon Nov 9 07:31:37 PST 2015
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:23:34PM +0100, Stanislav Kinsburskiу wrote:
>
> 9 нояб. 2015 г. 4:15 PM пользователь Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov at virtuozzo.com> написал:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > 09.11.2015 15:13, Andrew Vagin пишет:
> > > >On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 07:37:31PM +0300, Evgenii Shatokhin wrote:
> > > >>05.11.2015 18:45, Konstantin Khorenko пишет:
> > > >>>Zenya,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>1) an idea from Volodya Davydov: we can store the pointer to ve_struct,
> > > >>>not the veid,
> > > >>> thus we'll eliminate possible races with veid reuse.
> > > >>OK.
> > > >>The main question is though, whether we should care about the situations
> > > >>where something is mounted from a VE and umounted from VE0. If we should
> > > >>not, it is not needed to change struct mount at all.
> > > >We can't disable this operation, so I think we should.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Could you elaborate on this, please?
> > > Why should we care about such situations?
> >
> > external bind mounts are mounted from ve0 and can be unmounted from
> > inside ve
>
> Ок. But what problems it could bring?
Unbalanced mnt_nr
More information about the Devel
mailing list