[Devel] [PATCH rh7 v2] ve/vznetstat: Don't destroy statistics until explicitly asked

Cyrill Gorcunov gorcunov at virtuozzo.com
Fri Jul 24 09:05:05 PDT 2015


On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:50:49PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:48:52PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:39:27PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Yes. There might be several nets.
> > > 
> > > Hmm, correct. Then you'd better check this explicitly:
> > > 
> > > 	if (ve->ve_netns == net)
> > > 		...
> > > 
> > > Otherwise, you can omit clearing ve->stat if you race with e.g.
> > > VZCTL_TC_CLEAR_STAT, which also increments/decrements ->users.
> > 
> > I would rather prefer take write lock @tc_lock here.
> 
> Why?

Because it's more reliable I think, I mean venetstat module does
own counting for users and we can follow this rule -- use counter
for anythig. Sure ve->ve_netns can be used here as well but I
prefer counter. What's the profit of using @ve_netns instead?



More information about the Devel mailing list