[Devel] [PATCH RHEL7 COMMIT] ms/percpu-refcount: Don't use silly cmpxchg()
Konstantin Khorenko
khorenko at virtuozzo.com
Fri Aug 28 03:49:21 PDT 2015
The commit is pushed to "branch-rh7-3.10.0-229.7.2-ovz" and will appear at https://src.openvz.org/scm/ovz/vzkernel.git
after rh7-3.10.0-229.7.2.vz7.6.3
------>
commit 337bb797aa4aa5eca030d634d0a9874290511db5
Author: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov at parallels.com>
Date: Fri Aug 28 14:49:21 2015 +0400
ms/percpu-refcount: Don't use silly cmpxchg()
Patchset description:
Pulling upstream patches converting css refcnt to percpu_ref.
https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-34174
Kent Overstreet (2):
percpu: implement generic percpu refcounting
percpu-refcount: Don't use silly cmpxchg()
Tejun Heo (9):
percpu-refcount: consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU
percpu-refcount: cosmetic updates
percpu-refcount: add __must_check to percpu_ref_init() and don't use
ACCESS_ONCE() in percpu_ref_kill_rcu()
percpu-refcount: implement percpu_ref_cancel_init()
percpu-refcount: implement percpu_tryget() along with
percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm()
percpu-refcount: use RCU-sched insted of normal RCU
cgroup: reorder the operations in cgroup_destroy_locked()
cgroup: split cgroup destruction into two steps
cgroup: use percpu refcnt for cgroup_subsys_states
===
This patch description:
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet at google.com>
The cmpxchg() was just to ensure the debug check didn't race, which was
a bit excessive. The caller is supposed to do the appropriate
synchronization, which means percpu_ref_kill() can just do a simple
store.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet at google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit c1ae6e9b4db00023b9caed72af49a93abad46452)
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov at parallels.com>
---
lib/percpu-refcount.c | 19 ++++---------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/percpu-refcount.c b/lib/percpu-refcount.c
index 6f0ffd7..1a17399 100644
--- a/lib/percpu-refcount.c
+++ b/lib/percpu-refcount.c
@@ -107,22 +107,11 @@ static void percpu_ref_kill_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
*/
void percpu_ref_kill(struct percpu_ref *ref)
{
- unsigned __percpu *pcpu_count, *old, *new;
+ WARN_ONCE(REF_STATUS(ref->pcpu_count) == PCPU_REF_DEAD,
+ "percpu_ref_kill() called more than once!\n");
- pcpu_count = ACCESS_ONCE(ref->pcpu_count);
-
- do {
- if (REF_STATUS(pcpu_count) == PCPU_REF_DEAD) {
- WARN(1, "percpu_ref_kill() called more than once!\n");
- return;
- }
-
- old = pcpu_count;
- new = (unsigned __percpu *)
- (((unsigned long) pcpu_count)|PCPU_REF_DEAD);
-
- pcpu_count = cmpxchg(&ref->pcpu_count, old, new);
- } while (pcpu_count != old);
+ ref->pcpu_count = (unsigned __percpu *)
+ (((unsigned long) ref->pcpu_count)|PCPU_REF_DEAD);
call_rcu(&ref->rcu, percpu_ref_kill_rcu);
}
More information about the Devel
mailing list