[Devel] Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] memcg: kmem accounting lifecycle management

[Glauber Costa]

On 10/01/2012 04:36 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 01-10-12 16:29:11, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> On 10/01/2012 04:15 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> Based on the previous discussions I guess this one will get reworked,
>>> right?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, but most of it stayed. The hierarchy part is gone, but because we
>> will still have kmem pages floating around (potentially), I am still
>> using the mark_dead() trick with the corresponding get when kmem_accounted.
> 
> Is it OK if I hold on with the review of this one until the next
> version?
> 
Of course.

I haven't sent it yet because I also received a lot more feedback for
the slab part (which is expected), and I want to get a least part of
that going before I send it again.