[Devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] get rid of populate for memcg

[Glauber Costa]

On 03/21/2012 08:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I don't quite get why a protocol module would be loaded but not
> reigstered.  Do we actually have cases like that?  I know it's
> mechanically possible but don't think there's any actual use case or
> existing code which does that, so no need to worry about them.
>

Probably I'm just over worrying here. If your macro can handle 
unregistering well, I think I should be fine using them.