[Devel] Re: [PATCH 04/10] memcg: Introduce __GFP_NOACCOUNT.

Suleiman Souhlal suleiman at google.com
Tue Mar 6 08:13:14 PST 2012


On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Glauber Costa <glommer at parallels.com> wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 04:10 AM, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
>>
>> Just a few lines below:
>>
>>         data = kmalloc_node_track_caller(size, gfp_mask, node);
>>
>> -- Suleiman
>
> Can't we just make sure those come from the root cgroup's slabs?
> Then we need no flag.

Do you mean make it so that all kmallocs come from the root cgroup's slabs?
We would really like to account kmallocs in general (and all the other
slab types) to the right cgroup...

That said, I'm probably going to concentrate on accounting specially
marked caches only, for now, since there seems to be a strong
opposition on accounting everything, even though I don't understand
this point of view.

-- Suleiman




More information about the Devel mailing list