[Devel] Re: [Patch 0/2] Checkpoint and restart of file locks
Sukadev Bhattiprolu
sukadev at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Jan 11 16:17:00 PST 2011
Oren Laadan [orenl at cs.columbia.edu] wrote:
|
| The following two patches add c/r support for POSIX file locks. They
| are based on the series posted by Suka some time ago:
| https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2010-October/025855.html
|
| Suka:
|
| When I read your post I thought that boht posix and flock were
| supported, but looking at the code I saw only posix. Am I missing
| anything ?
Hmm. I have been working with only the posix locks for starters since
it checkpoints/restarts the more general, 'struct file_lock' object.
But I should make that explicit. If a patch description implies that
it covers flocks can be checkpointed, please let me know and I will
fix it.
C/R of leases/file-owner info is blocked on C/R of 'struct pids'.
|
| Also, I'm not sure that all the input is well sanitized during
| restart - for example, the possible values for the lock flags.
| Any thoughts ?
I have this check in restore_file_locks():
+ ret = -EBADF;
+ if (h->fl_flags & FL_POSIX)
+ ret = restore_one_posix_lock(ctx, file, fd,
The other fields (lock type for instance) will be validated by flock64_set()
as for a new fcntl() call - no ?
|
| Lastly, do you have test cases to run against this patch and test
| it ?
Yes, I added some tests to cr-tests a while ago and then updated them.
Will find the updates and post them.
Sukadev
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list