[Devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] memcg: per cgroup dirty page accounting

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Sun,  3 Oct 2010 23:57:55 -0700
Greg Thelen <gthelen at google.com> wrote:

> Greg Thelen (10):
>   memcg: add page_cgroup flags for dirty page tracking
>   memcg: document cgroup dirty memory interfaces
>   memcg: create extensible page stat update routines
>   memcg: disable local interrupts in lock_page_cgroup()
>   memcg: add dirty page accounting infrastructure
>   memcg: add kernel calls for memcg dirty page stats
>   memcg: add dirty limits to mem_cgroup
>   memcg: add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty limits
>   writeback: make determine_dirtyable_memory() static.
>   memcg: check memcg dirty limits in page writeback

Greg, this is a patch on your set.

 mmotm-1014 
 - memcg-reduce-lock-hold-time-during-charge-moving.patch
   (I asked Andrew to drop this)
 + your 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10 (dropped patch "4")

I'm grad if you merge this to your set as replacement of "4".
I'll prepare a performance improvement patch and post it if this dirty_limit
patches goes to -mm.

Thank you for your work.

==
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com>

Now, at supporing dirty limit, there is a deadlock problem in accounting.

 1. If pages are being migrated from a memcg, then updates to that
memcg page statistics are protected by grabbing a bit spin lock
using lock_page_cgroup().  In recent changes of dirty page accounting
is updating memcg page accounting (specifically: num writeback pages)
from IRQ context (softirq).  Avoid a deadlocking nested spin lock attempt
by irq on the local processor when grabbing the page_cgroup.

 2. lock for update_stat is used only for avoiding race with move_account().
So, IRQ awareness of lock_page_cgroup() itself is not a problem. The problem
is in update_stat() and move_account().

Then, this reworks locking scheme of update_stat() and move_account() by
adding new lock bit PCG_MOVE_LOCK, which is always taken under IRQ disable.

Trade-off
  * using lock_page_cgroup() + disable IRQ has some impacts on performance
    and I think it's bad to disable IRQ when it's not necessary.
  * adding a new lock makes move_account() slow. Score is here.

Peformance Impact: moving a 8G anon process.

Before:
	real    0m0.792s
	user    0m0.000s
	sys     0m0.780s

After:
	real    0m0.854s
	user    0m0.000s
	sys     0m0.842s

This score is bad but planned patches for optimization can reduce
this impact.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/page_cgroup.h |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 mm/memcontrol.c             |    9 +++++++--
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: dirty_limit_new/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
===================================================================
--- dirty_limit_new.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
+++ dirty_limit_new/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
@@ -35,15 +35,18 @@ struct page_cgroup *lookup_page_cgroup(s
 
 enum {
 	/* flags for mem_cgroup */
-	PCG_LOCK,  /* page cgroup is locked */
+	PCG_LOCK,  /* Lock for pc->mem_cgroup and following bits. */
 	PCG_CACHE, /* charged as cache */
 	PCG_USED, /* this object is in use. */
-	PCG_ACCT_LRU, /* page has been accounted for */
+	PCG_MIGRATION, /* under page migration */
+	/* flags for mem_cgroup and file and I/O status */
+	PCG_MOVE_LOCK, /* For race between move_account v.s. following bits */
 	PCG_FILE_MAPPED, /* page is accounted as "mapped" */
 	PCG_FILE_DIRTY, /* page is dirty */
 	PCG_FILE_WRITEBACK, /* page is under writeback */
 	PCG_FILE_UNSTABLE_NFS, /* page is NFS unstable */
-	PCG_MIGRATION, /* under page migration */
+	/* No lock in page_cgroup */
+	PCG_ACCT_LRU, /* page has been accounted for (under lru_lock) */
 };
 
 #define TESTPCGFLAG(uname, lname)			\
@@ -119,6 +122,10 @@ static inline enum zone_type page_cgroup
 
 static inline void lock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Don't take this lock in IRQ context.
+	 * This lock is for pc->mem_cgroup, USED, CACHE, MIGRATION
+	 */
 	bit_spin_lock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
 }
 
@@ -127,6 +134,24 @@ static inline void unlock_page_cgroup(st
 	bit_spin_unlock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
 }
 
+static inline void move_lock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+	unsigned long *flags)
+{
+	/*
+	 * We know updates to pc->flags of page cache's stats are from both of
+	 * usual context or IRQ context. Disable IRQ to avoid deadlock.
+	 */
+	local_irq_save(*flags);
+	bit_spin_lock(PCG_MOVE_LOCK, &pc->flags);
+}
+
+static inline void move_unlock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc,
+	unsigned long *flags)
+{
+	bit_spin_unlock(PCG_MOVE_LOCK, &pc->flags);
+	local_irq_restore(*flags);
+}
+
 #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR */
 struct page_cgroup;
 
Index: dirty_limit_new/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- dirty_limit_new.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ dirty_limit_new/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1784,6 +1784,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_update_page_stat(struct 
 	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
 	struct page_cgroup *pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
 	bool need_unlock = false;
+	unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags);
 
 	if (unlikely(!pc))
 		return;
@@ -1795,7 +1796,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_update_page_stat(struct 
 	/* pc->mem_cgroup is unstable ? */
 	if (unlikely(mem_cgroup_stealed(mem))) {
 		/* take a lock against to access pc->mem_cgroup */
-		lock_page_cgroup(pc);
+		move_lock_page_cgroup(pc, &flags);
 		need_unlock = true;
 		mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
 		if (!mem || !PageCgroupUsed(pc))
@@ -1856,7 +1857,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_update_page_stat(struct 
 
 out:
 	if (unlikely(need_unlock))
-		unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
+		move_unlock_page_cgroup(pc, &flags);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return;
 }
@@ -2426,9 +2427,13 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struc
 		struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to, bool uncharge)
 {
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
 	lock_page_cgroup(pc);
 	if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && pc->mem_cgroup == from) {
+		move_lock_page_cgroup(pc, &flags);
 		__mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, from, to, uncharge);
+		move_unlock_page_cgroup(pc, &flags);
 		ret = 0;
 	}
 	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers