[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH][cr]: Mark ghost tasks as detached earlier
Sukadev Bhattiprolu
sukadev at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Nov 2 08:57:04 PDT 2010
Oren Laadan [orenl at cs.columbia.edu] wrote:
|
|
| On 10/30/2010 03:01 AM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| Let me see if I get this correctly: first, the container-init calls
| wait(), then goes to sleep because children aren't ready, then the
| ghost changes state to detached and exits, but the container-init is
| not notified so not woken up. Is that correct ?
|
| If so, then the problem is that changing from non-detached to detached
| is racy. Therefore, just doing it earlier may still not be correct,
| because the race (theoretically) still exists. It just makes it less
| likely to occur.
True. I was trying to understand if there was a need to mark it detached
that late.
|
| If this analysis is correct, then I can think of two options:
|
| 1) when creating the ghost tasks, create them as detached from
| user-space, and they won't need to be waited-for not become
| detached.
Yes and if we remove the assignment to ->exit_signal in do_ghost_task(),
we should be fine. This would be a better option than sending a signal
to the parent.
Sukadev
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list