[Devel] Re: [PATCH] make cr depend on all namespaces
Serge E. Hallyn
serge at hallyn.com
Mon Mar 15 14:52:44 PDT 2010
Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl at cs.columbia.edu):
>
>
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > This should let us get rid of some ifdefed code and reduce
> > chances for bad config combinations. There's really no reason
> > to support it.
>
> I disagree.
>
> You are right that this will reduce the changes of bad config
> combinations.
>
> However, it will also introduce some restrictions on the kernel
> config which are unnecessary. Some people may not want to have
> all namespaces configured.
Why? The only reason right now to disable namespaces is for
kernel size.
> Note that the namespaces are independent in the sense that we
> don't need to test all combination of all namespaces - instead,
> I consider turning on/off one at a time to be safe enough.
And do you do that? :) It still gets more complicated bc
you have things like sysvipc and posix mq which both can allow
ipc_ns.
> (FWIW, is it because you only wanted to show a point that you
> only remove UTS_NS ifdefs ?)
It was just right there in my face...
Anyway if you don't take this patch then the UTS_NS code I
removed should have 'name' put under ifdef to avoid a build
warning.
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list