[Devel] [PATCH linux-cr urgent] lsm: fix unlabeled restore case.
Serge E. Hallyn
serue at us.ibm.com
Fri Mar 12 12:47:06 PST 2010
If an object is being restored which was checkpointed without an
LSM label, then we should return 0 BEFORE we try to ckpt_obj_fetch
a -1 objref (and obviously return error).
This makes the msg cr_tests ipc testcase fail if, for instance,
CONFIG_SECURITY=y but no LSM is active.
IMO this definately should be in the tree that gets sent out...
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue at us.ibm.com>
---
security/security.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 2b147cf..4b3f932 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -1528,14 +1528,14 @@ int security_restore_obj(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, void *v, int sectype,
if (sectype != CKPT_SECURITY_MSG_MSG)
return 0;
- l = ckpt_obj_fetch(ctx, secref, CKPT_OBJ_SECURITY);
- if (IS_ERR(l))
- return PTR_ERR(l);
-
/* return if checkpointed label was "Not Applicable" */
if (secref == SECURITY_CTX_NONE)
return 0;
+ l = ckpt_obj_fetch(ctx, secref, CKPT_OBJ_SECURITY);
+ if (IS_ERR(l))
+ return PTR_ERR(l);
+
/* Ask the LSM to apply a void*security to the object
* based on the checkpointed context string */
switch (sectype) {
--
1.6.1
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list