[Devel] Re: [PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: dirty pages accounting and limiting infrastructure

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com
Mon Mar 8 16:20:54 PST 2010


On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:18:45 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura at mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:31:00 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:07:11 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura at mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:

> > Hmm...accepatable ? (sounds it's in error-range)
> > 
> > BTW, why local_irq_disable() ? 
> > local_irq_save()/restore() isn't better ?
> > 
> I don't have any strong reason. All of lock_page_cgroup() is *now* called w/o irq disabled,
> so I used just disable()/enable() instead of save()/restore().

My point is, this will be used under treelock soon.

Thanks,
-Kame

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




More information about the Devel mailing list