[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control.

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Tuesday 2010-03-02 16:03, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:

>> I agree with all the points you and Pavel you talked about but I don't 
>> feel comfortable to have the current process to switch the pid namespace 
>> because of the process tree hierarchy (what will be the parent of the 
>> process when you enter the pid namespace for example).
>
>The answer is - the one, that used to be. I see no problems with it.
>Do you?

But perhaps it could be named "namespacefd" instead of nsfd, to reduce 
potential clashes (because glibc will usually just use the same name 
when making the syscall available as a C function).
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers